Results
· Ranked by Syfertize
Paulo Arruda v. Michael v. Fair, Etc. · 0 red 0 yellow 50 green 20 procedural Cited as authority Perez Cited as authority Sloley Cited as authority Chacon Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 61
...Second, the special security area, known as the DSU or Block 10, is a “prison within a prison,” designed to hold the most dangerous inmates — those “whose continued retention in the general institution population is detrimental to the program of the institution.” Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 127, § 39. Arruda was...
Four Unnamed v. Hall · 0 red 1 yellow 1 green 0 procedural Cited "but see" Bills Cited as authority Jefferson Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 38
...Those circumstances and procedures are set forth in Massachusetts statutes and State Department of Corrections Regulations.
Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 127, § 39 grants the Commissioner of Corrections the discretion to order the segregation of any inmate “whose continued retention in the general institution population is...
Dennis J. Domegan v. Michael v. Fair · 0 red 0 yellow 51 green 3 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority EMMERT Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 74
...Even when in “segregated units,” inmates “shall” be provided “regular meals.” Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 127, § 39 (West 1974). The statutory framework hollowed out no interstice wherein an inmate might be deprived of both “regular” and “full” meals. And the drafters’ use of the imperative form is telling; the statutes...
Roberts v. State of Rhode Islan · 0 red 1 yellow 54 green 0 procedural Cited "but see" (citing case) Cited as authority Perez Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 64
...id.
at 887 (quoting Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 127 § 39), nor did Rhode Island differentiate its search to focus on such inmates. Unlike in
McGuinness v. DuBois · 0 red 0 yellow 7 green 0 procedural Cited as authority DuPont Cited as authority Hudson Cited as authority Torres Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 51
...do Massachusetts Regulations authorizing sentences to DDU as a disciplinary sanction for a period up to ten years violate Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 127, §§ 39, 40?
The Court is not without guidance on this question...
John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold Bishop · 0 red 0 yellow 116 green 94 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority Wilkins Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 66
...
. Fitzpatrick had the statutory authority to transfer. Mass.Gen.Laws ch. 127, § 39.
. Defendants...