Results
· Ranked by Syfertize
Martha D. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee · 0 red 0 yellow 169 green 1 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority Duke Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 71
...Young’s objections unreasonable. 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1; see fn. 5, supra. Although it is certainly true that an employer sometimes cannot reasonably accommodate the religious needs and observances of all of its employees, see Johnson...
Danny R. Smith v. Pyro Mining Company · 0 red 5 yellow 89 green 38 procedural Cited "but see" (citing case) Cited "but see" (citing case) Declined to follow Haliye Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 80
...Such undue hardship, for example, may exist where the employee’s needed work cannot be performed by another employee of substantially similar qualifications during the period of absence of the Sabbath observer.
29 C.F.R. § 1605.1(b...
Paul CUMMINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PARKER SEAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee · 1 red 0 yellow 17 green 0 procedural Vacated (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 62
...because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin .
An EEOC Regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (1974), which was in force at the time of Appellant’s discharge, provides as follows:
Larry G. Hardison, Appellant, v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., Et Al., Appellees · 0 red 0 yellow 13 green 0 procedural Cited as authority Hout Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 61
...For example, an employer who is closed for business on Sunday does not discriminate merely because he requires that all his employees be available for work on Saturday.
29 C.F.R. § 1605.1(a)(3), 31 Fed.Reg...
McCann L. REID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEMPHIS PUBLISHING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee 48
...regulation (29 C.F.R. § 1605.1) requiring reasonable accommodation of religious beliefs.
The District Judge who tried this case on remand found that defendant Memphis Publishing Co. “did not make any attempt to accommodate the religious needs of...
McCann L. Reid v. Memphis Publishing Company · 0 red 1 yellow 13 green 0 procedural Cited "but see" Rankins Cited as authority Abercrombie Cited as authority Kumar Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 60
...regulation (29 C.F.R. 1605.1 (1970)) which is applicable to the refusal to hire appellant Reid.
29 C.F.R. 1605, adopted July 10, 1967, provides:
PART 1605 — GUIDELINES ON DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF RELIGION
Lois Davis v. Fort Bend County · 0 red 0 yellow 72 green 11 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority Ibrahim Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 75
...These statements “define religious practices to include moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional views” whenever the religious nature of a belief is at issue. 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1
McCann L. REID, Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. MEMPHIS PUBLISHING COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant · 1 red 0 yellow 7 green 9 procedural Receded from (citing case) Cited as authority Jordan Cited as authority Kumar Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 65
...1972), this court upheld the applicability and constitutionality of an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulation, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (1974), and remanded the case *523to the District Court for hearing and determinations...
Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern Pennsylvania · 0 red 0 yellow 152 green 0 procedural Cited as authority WILLIAMS-TURNER Cited as authority Adair Cited as authority LOPEZ Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 80
...Fallon, quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1, argues that religious beliefs are moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong that are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views. This argument is incorrect. The next sentence of the...
Cooper v. General Dynamics, Convair Aerospace Division · 0 red 0 yellow 4 green 4 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 56
...The guidelines went on to state, however, that the employer was free to establish a normal work week generally applicable to all employees, “notwithstanding that this schedule may not operate with uniformity in its effect upon the religious observances of his employees.” 29 C.F...
John H. DRAPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee · 0 red 1 yellow 79 green 1 procedural Cited "but see" Kalsi Cited as authority Collias Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 86
...The central issue in the case was whether the Company complied with 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j) and 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (1974), both of which in effect require an employer to undertake a reasonable accommodation of its employees’ religious practices...
Wright v. Honeywell International 48
...765 F.3d at 485 (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1; citing
United States v. Seeger,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Unión Independiente De La Autoridad De Acueductos Y Alcantarillados · 0 red 0 yellow 90 green 0 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority Geronimo Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 81
...observance and practice, as well as belief_” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j);
see also
29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (“[R]eligious practices ... include moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the...
Anderson v. General Dynamics Convair Aerospace Division · 0 red 0 yellow 40 green 27 procedural Cited as authority WINANS Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority Wagner Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 67
...1972, Congress enacted 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j), incorporating the substance of the 1967 EEOC guidelines (29 C.F.R. § 1605.1). The section provides:
“The term ‘religion’ includes all aspects of religious observance and practice, as well...
James D. JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U. S. POSTAL SERVICE, Plaintiff-Appellee 48
...to make all reasonable accommodations to the religious needs of their employees.
29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 Observation of the Sabbath and other religious holidays.
(b) The Commission believes that the duty not...
Naisha Chinnery v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic 48
...4 of 6
moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the
strength of traditional religious views.” 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (2024); see Welsh v. United
States,
Rodges REDMOND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GAF CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant · 0 red 0 yellow 72 green 0 procedural Cited as authority Detwiler Cited as authority Piccolo Cited as authority Sattley Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 79
...Support for the Sabbatarianism limitation can be found in the title given by the EEOC in its guidelines on the subject, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (1975), “Observation of Sabbath and other Religious Holidays.” Similarly, the legislative history reveals that the amendment was...
Williams v. Southern Union Gas Co. · 0 red 0 yellow 14 green 8 procedural Cited as authority Champaign Cited as authority Morrissette-Brown Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 65
...In 1967 the following regulation which now appears as 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (1975) was promulgated:
Observation of the Sabbath and other religious holidays.
(a) Several complaints filed with the Commission have...
S.R. Seshadri v. Masoud Kasraian · 0 red 0 yellow 51 green 0 procedural Cited as authority Distefano Followed Distefano Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 79
...13 L.Ed.2d 733 (1965), does not think that the plaintiff in a case of religious discrimination must be a member of an authorized church or subscribe to its full menu of orthodox beliefs. 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1
Angeline S. Protos v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. · 0 red 1 yellow 60 green 34 procedural Distinguished Keck Cited as authority GLOVER Cited as authority DAVIES Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 72
...The amendment was intended to clarify the scope of an EEOC guideline, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1 (1968), which required employers to make reasonable accommodations "to the religious needs" of employees and prospective employees, short of undue hardship. As an example of a...
Doris McDaniel v. Essex International, Inc., A/K/A Essex Wire, a Michigan Corporation, and International Association of MacHinists Local Lodge No. 982 · 0 red 0 yellow 10 green 3 procedural Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority Bushouse Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 56
...has previously upheld the constitutionality of § 701(j) and the EEOC regulation from which it was taken, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1, promulgated in 1967.
Cummins v. Parker Seal Co.,
Yott v. North American Rockwell Corp. · 0 red 0 yellow 13 green 1 procedural Cited as authority Boeing Cited as authority (citing case) Cited as authority (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 56
...They cite the EEOC’s Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion, 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1,5 questioning the validity of the handling of the accommodation issue in Dewey v...
Perry Jordan, Appellee, v. North Carolina National Bank, Appellant · 4 red 1 yellow 11 green 0 procedural Overruled Cary Overruled (citing case) Overruled (citing case) Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 49
...At the time of the events involved here, a guideline of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), 29 C.F.R. § 1605.1(b), required, as the Act itself now does, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j), that an employer, short of “undue hardship...
Yott v. North American Rockwell Corporation · 0 red 0 yellow 2 green 0 procedural Cited as authority Rankins Cited as authority Anderson Open case for full Syfertize analysis → 56
...They cite the EEOC's Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion, 29 C.F.R. 1605.1, questioning the validity of the handling of the accommodation issue in Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., supra, as the law in the area...
Kristen Barnett v. INOVA Health Care Services 48
...The
regulations define religious practices to “include moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right
and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.” 29
C.F.R. § 1605.1 (2024).
To qualify for Title...