Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 6-5-754 (2026)

Choice of Forum.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If a claim under the common or statutory law of another state, the United States, or a foreign country or under international treaty for death or injury to person or damage to property arises against a manufacturer out of an accident that occurred outside this state, such claim may be brought in the courts of this state in any county in which jurisdiction of the defendant can be legally obtained in the same manner in which jurisdiction could have been obtained if the claim had arisen in this state.

(b) The courts of this state shall apply the doctrine of forum non conveniens in determining whether to accept or decline to take jurisdiction of an action asserting a claim arising out of an accident occurring outside this state.

(c) In applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens, the court shall take into account each of the following considerations:

(1) The state in which the claimant resides, giving deference to the claimant’s choice of forum only if the claimant is a resident of this state.

(2) The location where the acts or occurrences giving rise to the action occurred.

(3) The convenience of the parties and witnesses.

(4) The interests of justice.

(d) If upon motion of any defendant it is shown that there exists a more appropriate forum outside this state, the court must dismiss the action without prejudice. Dismissal may be conditioned upon the defendant filing with the court a consent (1) to submit to jurisdiction in the identified forum, or (2) to waive any statute of limitations defense not already existing if an action on the same cause of action is commenced in the identified forum within 60 days of the dismissal.

(e) An order denying a motion to dismiss under this section shall be immediately appealable, as a matter of right, upon filing of a notice of appeal in accordance with the Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure.

(Act 2013-73, p. 148, §5.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co. v. Pro Abstract Co., Inc. (CONSENT) (M.D. Ala. 2022).
Mississippi Valley Title Ins. Co. v. Pro Abstract Co., Inc. (CONSENT) (M.D. Ala. 2022). · cites it 2× “Recognizing that proper application of the Alabama Legal Services Liability Act would likely be dispositive, the Eleventh Circuit on appeal certified to the Alabama Supreme Court the question of whether “an attorney whom an insurance company hires as an attorney agent [is]…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.