For the purposes of this article, the following terms shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section:
(1) UNIT. Every county, city, town, district, or other political subdivision in the state of Alabama.
(2) OBLIGATIONS. Bonds, warrants, certificates of indebtedness, and notes of a unit, including bonds, warrants, certificates of indebtedness, and notes that are general obligations of the issuing unit and those that are payable solely from a specified source.
(3) DISTRICT ATTORNEY. The district attorney of the judicial circuit for the county or, if such has been appointed by the district attorney, an assistant district attorney who represents such county.
(Acts 1935, No. 196, p. 582; Code 1940, T. 7, §169; Acts 1971, No. 972, p. 1734.)
Notes of Decisions
Chism v. Jefferson Cnty., 954 So. 2d 1058 (Ala. 2006).
· cites it 2× “laintiffs complain in the statement of facts in their brief to this Court that these obligations were issued and sold by Jefferson County on a privately negotiated noncompetitive basis, without obtaining or seeking approval of the voters or of the Governor, and without the…”
Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Ctr. Auth. v. City of Birmingham, 912 So. 2d 204 (Ala. 2005).
· cites it 2× “On January 27, 2004, the Authority petitioned the Jefferson Circuit Court, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 6-6-750 et seq., [3] *207 seeking to validate the proposed issue of $1 million in bonds to renovate the Birmingham-Jefferson Civic Center.”
Shell v. Jefferson Cnty., 454 So. 2d 1331 (Ala. 1984).
· cites it 2× “This is an action for the validation of a proposed issue of sewer revenue bonds by Jefferson County, Alabama (the County), initiated by a petition by the County and the members of its governing body, pursuant to the provisions of § 6-6-750, et seq., Ala.Code 1975, in the Circuit…”
Taxpayers & Citizens of Shelby Cnty. v. Acker, 641 So. 2d 259 (Ala. 1994).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 6-6-750 et seq. (the “validation law”), the trial court validated the issuance and sale of certain “limited obligation refunding warrants.”
O'GRADY v. City of Hoover, 519 So. 2d 1292 (Ala. 1987).
· cites it 3× “This is an appeal from a judgment entered in a statutory validation proceeding initiated by the City of Hoover, Alabama (the "City"), pursuant to the provisions of Ala.Code (1975), §§ 6-6-750 et seq., to validate general obligation warrants in the principal amount of $12,150,000.”
Guarisco v. City of Daphne, 825 So. 2d 750 (Ala. 2002).
“Pursuant to § 6-6-750 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, the City, the city council, and the mayor filed a petition in the Circuit Court of Baldwin County, seeking to validate a $5,700,000 limited obligation revenue warrant ("the Warrant"), which, upon issuance, would be used to purchase…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.