Code of Alabama
Ala. Code § 7-1-101 (2026)
Short Titles.
✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
(a) This title may be cited as the Uniform Commercial Code.
(b) This article may be cited as Uniform Commercial Code - General Provisions.
(Prior version of this section added by Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811; repealed by Act 2004-524, p. 1070, §§1, 3; current section added by Act 2004-524, p. 1070, §1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1983–2012 · leading case: Greene v. Assocs. (In Re Green), 248 B.R. 583 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2000).
Greene v. Assocs. (In Re Green), 248 B.R. 583 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2000). “§ 362 , one needs to read the explicit language of Alabama’s Uniform Commercial Code, Ala.Code §§ 7-1-101 et seq. (1997), in conjunction with the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.”
Green Tree — Al LLC v. Dominion Resources, L.L.C., 104 So. 3d 177 (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). “Under the Alabama Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”), Ala.Code 1975, § 7-1-101 et seq., the holder of a perfected, priority security interest in a fixture, like a manufactured home, may remove the fixture from the real property on which it sits upon default by the purchaser, and…”
Tittle v. Steel City Oldsmobile GMC Truck, Inc., 544 So. 2d 883 (Ala. 1989). “"), § 7-1-101 et seq., Ala.Code (1975). In their answers to the plaintiff's complaint, both Steel City and General Motors specifically pleaded the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense.”
Browning Enter. v. Rex Iron & Mach. Prods. Co., Inc., 504 F. Supp. 2d 1217 (N.D. Ala. 2007). “See UCC § 1-201(36) & l-202(d), as adopted in Ala. Code § 7-1-101 et seq. (2005) and Colo.”
Fausak's Tire Ctr., Inc. v. Blanchard, 959 So. 2d 1132 (Ala. Civ. App. 2006). “[5] The main opinion has supplied a method for determining the purchase price, but it has not established *1146 that the parties agreed to that method.”
CPI Oil & Refining, Inc. v. Metro Energy Co., 557 F. Supp. 958 (N.D. Ala. 1983). “This problem was legislatively dealt with after Geneva Gin and resolved by the draftsmen of the Uniform Commercial Code, adopted in Alabama at Alabama Code (1975) §§ 7-1-101 et seq. The market overt concept of the common law is included where the goods being sold are ostensibly…”
Braden Furniture Co. v. Union State Bank, 109 So. 3d 625 (Ala. 2012). “The UCC is found in the Ala.Code 1975, §§ 7-1-101 through 7-11-108.”
Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. v. Williams, 64 So. 3d 1062 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010). “The purchaser’s complaint asserted that he should be entitled to revoke his acceptance of the automobile under the Alabama Uniform Commercial Code (Ala. Code 1975, § 7-1-101 et seq.), that the manufacturer had breached express and implied warranties, and that he was entitled to…”
Gordon v. Acrocrete, Inc., 400 F. Supp. 2d 1310 (S.D. Ala. 2005). “The ARXX Defendants argue, and plaintiffs do not dispute, that the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose exist under Alabama law as a creature of the Uniform Commercial Code, Ala.Code §§ 7-1-101, et seq. (“UCC”). See generally CertainTeed…”
Am. Nat'l Red Cross v. ASD Specialty Health Care, Inc., 325 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (S.D. Ala. 2002). “Code § 7-1-101 et seq. In particular, defendants point to language commonly referred to across the nation as a “blood shield statute,” intended to remove blood and related products from the definition of “goods” which are subject to the provisions of state commercial codes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.