Ala. Code
Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-2-515 (2026)

Preserving Evidence of Goods in Dispute.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In furtherance of the adjustment of any claim or dispute:

(a) Either party on reasonable notification to the other and for the purpose of ascertaining the facts and preserving evidence has the right to inspect, test and sample the goods including such of them as may be in the possession or control of the other; and

(b) The parties may agree to a third-party inspection or survey to determine the conformity or condition of the goods and may agree that the findings shall be binding upon them in any subsequent litigation or adjustment.

(Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1999 · leading case: Premiere Chevrolet, Inc. v. Headrick, 748 So. 2d 891 (Ala. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Premiere Chevrolet, Inc. v. Headrick, 748 So. 2d 891 (Ala. 1999). “and the purchaser(s), in connection with any litigation, arbitration or request for adjustment, pursuant to the provision of § 7-2-515(b) of the 1975 Code of Alabama.”
Warren v. Jim Skinner Ford, Inc., 565 So. 2d 210 (Ala. 1990). · cites it 7× “The Warrens now ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to reverse its order granting Jim Skinner Ford’s motion to have the trial court enforce a “binding inspection” provision of the parties’ agreement, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 7-2-515(b). Jim…”
— Ala. Code § 7-2-515(b) — 2 cases
Premiere Chevrolet, Inc. v. Headrick, 748 So. 2d 891 (Ala. 1999). “and the purchaser(s), in connection with any litigation, arbitration or request for adjustment, pursuant to the provision of § 7-2-515(b) of the 1975 Code of Alabama.”
Warren v. Jim Skinner Ford, Inc., 565 So. 2d 210 (Ala. 1990). “The Warrens now ask this Court to issue a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to reverse its order granting Jim Skinner Ford’s motion to have the trial court enforce a “binding inspection” provision of the parties’ agreement, pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 7-2-515(b). Jim…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.