Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-2-718 (2026)

Liquidation or Limitation of Damages; Deposits.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Damages for breach by either party may be liquidated in the agreement but only at an amount which is reasonable in the light of the anticipated or actual harm caused by the breach, the difficulties of proof of loss, and the inconvenience or nonfeasibility of otherwise obtaining an adequate remedy. A term fixing unreasonably large liquidated damages is void as a penalty.

(2) Where the seller justifiably withholds delivery of goods because of the buyer’s breach, the buyer is entitled to restitution of any amount by which the sum of his payments exceeds:

(a) The amount to which the seller is entitled by virtue of terms liquidating the seller’s damages in accordance with subsection (1), or

(b) In the absence of such terms, 20 percent of the value of the total performance for which the buyer is obligated under the contract or $500, whichever is smaller.

(3) The buyer’s right to restitution under subsection (2) is subject to offset to the extent that the seller establishes:

(a) A right to recover damages under the provisions of this article other than subsection (1), and

(b) The amount or value of any benefits received by the buyer directly or indirectly by reason of the contract.

(4) Where a seller has received payment in goods, their reasonable value or the proceeds of their resale shall be treated as payments for the purposes of subsection (2); but if the seller has notice of the buyer’s breach before reselling goods received in part performance, his resale is subject to the conditions laid down in this article on resale by an aggrieved seller (Section 7-2-706).

(Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1982–2000 · leading case: Taylor v. Leedy & Co., Inc., 412 So. 2d 763 (Ala. 1982).
Taylor v. Leedy & Co., Inc., 412 So. 2d 763 (Ala. 1982). “See Code 1975, §§ 7-2-718, 7-2-719; Weaver v. American Oil Co.”
Moorer v. Hartz Seed Co., 120 F. Supp. 2d 1283 (M.D. Ala. 2000). “Section 7-2-719 provides: *1295 Subject to the provisions of subsection (2) and (3) of this section and of Section 7-2-718 on liquidation and limitation of damages: (a) The agreement may provide for remedies in addition to or in substitution for those provided in this article…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.