Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-4A-203 (2026)

Unenforceability of Certain Verified Payment Orders.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If an accepted payment order is not, under Section 7-4A-202(a), an authorized order of a customer identified as sender, but is effective as an order of the customer pursuant to Section 7-4A-202(b), the following rules apply:

(1) By express agreement evidenced by a record, the receiving bank may limit the extent to which it is entitled to enforce or retain payment of the payment order.

(2) The receiving bank is not entitled to enforce or retain payment of the payment order if the customer proves that the order was not caused, directly or indirectly, by a person (i) entrusted at any time with duties to act for the customer with respect to payment orders or the security procedure, or (ii) who obtained access to transmitting facilities of the customer or who obtained, from a source controlled by the customer and without authority of the receiving bank, information facilitating breach of the security procedure, regardless of how the information was obtained or whether the customer was at fault. Information includes any access device, computer software, or the like.

(b) This section applies to amendments of payment orders to the same extent it applies to payment orders.

(Acts 1992, 2nd Ex. Sess., No. 92-701, p. 145, §1; Act 2023-492, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Brannon v. BankTrust, Inc., 50 So. 3d 397 (Ala. 2010).
Brannon v. BankTrust, Inc., 50 So. 3d 397 (Ala. 2010). “Section 1 of the Official Comment following § 7-4A-203 explains that “[a] person in whose name a payment order is issued is considered to be the sender of the order if the order is ‘authorized’ as stated in subsection (a) [of § 7-4A-202] or if the order is ‘verified’ pursuant to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.