Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-8-115 (2026)

Securities Intermediary and Others Not Liable to Adverse Claimant.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A securities intermediary that has transferred a financial asset pursuant to an effective entitlement order, or a broker or other agent or bailee that has dealt with a financial asset at the direction of its customer or principal, is not liable to a person having an adverse claim to the financial asset, unless the securities intermediary, or broker or other agent or bailee:

(1) took the action after it had been served with an injunction, restraining order, or other legal process enjoining it from doing so, issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, and had a reasonable opportunity to act on the injunction, restraining order, or other legal process; or

(2) acted in collusion with the wrongdoer in violating the rights of the adverse claimant; or

(3) in the case of a security certificate that has been stolen, acted with notice of the adverse claim.

(Acts 1996, No. 96-742, p. 1241, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2007–2007 · leading case: Davis v. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc., 965 So. 2d 1076 (Ala. 2007).
Davis v. Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc., 965 So. 2d 1076 (Ala. 2007). · cites it 21× “' "Ala.Code § 7-8-115 (emphasis added.) As set forth in the legislative commentary, the purpose of this statute is to *1083 enable brokers to act on the instructions of their customers without fear of liability arising from disputed claims to the financial assets maintained in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.