Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-8-204 (2026)

Effect of Issuer’s Restriction on Transfer.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A restriction on transfer of a security imposed by the issuer, even if otherwise lawful, is ineffective against a person without knowledge of the restriction unless:

(1) the security is certificated and the restriction is noted conspicuously on the security certificate; or

(2) the security is uncertificated and the registered owner has been notified of the restriction.

(Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811; repealed by Acts 1996, No. 96-742, p. 1241, §1; added by Acts 1996, No. 96-742, p. 1241, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1987–1987 · leading case: Mcmillan, Ltd. v. Warrior Drilling & Eng., 512 So. 2d 14 (Ala. 1987).
Mcmillan, Ltd. v. Warrior Drilling & Eng., 512 So. 2d 14 (Ala. 1987). · cites it 4× “, that McMillan's unexercised option "is an `interest in the security' pursuant to § 7-8-301(1)") is "in accordance with Official Comment, Note 1 to [Code of 1975] § 7-8-204, which provides that a purchaser with actual knowledge of an unnoted restriction on the security has…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.