Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-9-101 (2026)

Short Title.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Act 2001-481, p. 647, § 4, effective January 1, 2002.

(Acts 1965, No. 549, p. 811.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1979–2005 · leading case: Mims v. First Citizens Bank, 913 So. 2d 1098 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005).
Mims v. First Citizens Bank, 913 So. 2d 1098 (Ala. Civ. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “We must interpret and apply various provisions of former Article 9 of the UCC, § 7-9-101 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, [4] relating to secured transactions.”
Mattheiss v. Title Loan Express (In Re Mattheiss), 214 B.R. 20 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1997). · cites it 2× “Code § 7-9-101 et seq.). Neither decision, though both involved pawned auto titles, even mentioned the Alabama Uniform Certificate of Title and Antitheft Act (Ala.”
Turner v. DeKalb Bank (In Re Turner), 209 B.R. 558 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 1997). · cites it 2× “The Official Comment to Ala.Code § 7-9-101, adopted by Alabama states, "(t)his article .”
Mardis v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 642 So. 2d 701 (Ala. 1994). “, § 7-9-101 et seq., Ala.Code 1975, was in fact a ratification of Cloverleaf's actions.”
Greene v. Assocs. (In Re Green), 248 B.R. 583 (Bankr. N.D. Ala. 2000). · cites it 2× “See generally Ala.Code §§ 7-9-101 et seq. (1997). The effect of the repeal of these laws has been that case law decided by reliance on any of them is abrogated for transactions entered into after the effective date of Alabama’s Uniform Commercial Code: midnight on December…”
Leasing Serv. Corp. v. Hobbs Equip. Co., 894 F.2d 1287 (11th Cir. 1990). “4 The official comments explain that section 7-9-402 adopts a system of notice filing.”
Citizens & S. Factors, Inc. v. Small Bus. Admin., 375 So. 2d 251 (Ala. 1979). “Although plaintiff-appellant C&S, the assignee of the accounts purchaser, had previously argued in the federal courts that the conveyance of title to the returned goods operated to prevent the attachment of the subsequent security interest of the inventory financer, is now…”
Hope v. Performance Auto., Inc., 710 So. 2d 1235 (Ala. 1998). · cites it 2× “Thus, as of March 4, 1991, SunTrust Bank’s security interest had attached to the inventory and equipment purchased by Performance Automotive, and it had become a perfected security interest under Alabama’s Uniform Commercial Code, Article 9 — “Secured Transactions” — Ala. Code…”
In re Dunning, 281 B.R. 22 (Bankr. S.D. Ala. 1999). “Alabama Code § § 7-9-101 et. seq. (1997) and § § 32-8-1 et.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.