Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-9A-201 (2026)

General Effectiveness of Security Agreement.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General effectiveness. Except as otherwise provided in the Uniform Commercial Code, a security agreement is effective according to its terms between the parties, against purchasers of the collateral, and against creditors.

(b) Applicable consumer laws and other law. A transaction subject to this article is subject to any applicable rule of law which establishes a different rule for consumers and to (i) any other statute or regulation that regulates the rates, charges, agreements, and practices for loans, credit sales, or other extensions of credit and (ii) any consumer-protection statute or regulation.

(c) Other applicable law controls. In case of conflict between this article and a rule of law, statute, or regulation described in subsection (b), the rule of law, statute, or regulation controls. Failure to comply with a statute or regulation described in subsection (b) has only the effect the statute or regulation specifies.

(d) Further deference to other applicable law. This article does not:

(1) validate any rate, charge, agreement, or practice that violates a rule of law, statute, or regulation described in subsection (b); or

(2) extend the application of the rule of law, statute, or regulation to a transaction not otherwise subject to it.

(Act 2001-481, p. 647, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: TitleMax of Alabama, Inc. v. Graham (S.D. Ala. 2022).
TitleMax of Alabama, Inc. v. Graham (S.D. Ala. 2022). “CODE § 7-9A-201(35). To create a security interest, parties need only evidence an intent to establish a security agreement.”
— Ala. Code § 7-9A-201(35) — 1 case
TitleMax of Alabama, Inc. v. Graham (S.D. Ala. 2022). “CODE § 7-9A-201(35). To create a security interest, parties need only evidence an intent to establish a security agreement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.