Code of Alabama

Ala. Code § 7-9A-314 (2026)

Perfection by Control.

✓ official Alabama Legislature (ALISON) text, current July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaAla. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Perfection by control. A security interest in controllable accounts, controllable electronic records, controllable payment intangibles, deposit accounts, electronic documents, investment property, or letter-of-credit rights may be perfected by control of the collateral under Section 7-7-106, 7-9A-104,, 7-9A-106, 7-9A-107, or 7-9A-107A.

(b) Specified collateral: Time of perfection by control; continuation of perfection. A security interest incontrollable accounts, controllable electronic records, controllable payment intangibles, deposit accounts, electronic documents, or letter-of-credit rights is perfected by control under Section 7-7-106, 7-9A-104, 7-9A-107, or 7-9A-107A not earlier than the time the secured party obtains control and remains perfected by control only while the secured party retains control.

(c) Investment property: Time of perfection by control; continuation of perfection. A security interest in investment property is perfected by control under Section 7-9A-106 not earlier than the time the secured party obtains control and remains perfected by control until:

(1) the secured party does not have control; and

(2) one of the following occurs:

(A) if the collateral is a certificated security, the debtor has or acquires possession of the security certificate;

(B) if the collateral is an uncertificated security, the issuer has registered or registers the debtor as the registered owner; or

(C) if the collateral is a security entitlement, the debtor is or becomes the entitlement holder.

(Act 2001-481, p. 647, §1; Act 2004-315, p. 464, §2; Act 2023-492, §1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2017–2017 · leading case: Citizens Bank & Trust v. Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distrib. Co., 228 So. 3d 469 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017).
Citizens Bank & Trust v. Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distrib. Co., 228 So. 3d 469 (Ala. Civ. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “On February 10, 2016, after a hearing to determine who had priority, the trial court entered a final judgment in which it found that Citizens had not filed a filing statement on the stock, it had not taken “control” of the stock pursuant to § 7-9A-314, Ala. Code 1975, and it had…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.