Notwithstanding the terms, provisions, or conditions of any dealer agreement, any person who suffers bodily injury, loss of profit, or property damage as a result of a violation of this chapter may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction in this state to enjoin further violations and to recover the damages sustained by him or her together with the costs of the suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee. The remedies set forth in this section shall not be deemed exclusive and shall be in addition to any other remedies permitted by law.
(Act 2009-755, p. 2279, §13.)
Notes of Decisions
Cowin Equip. Co. v. Terex USA, LLC (Ex parte Terex USA, LLC), 260 So. 3d 813 (Ala. 2018).
· cites it 8× “) Specifically, Terex argues in its petition that Cowin reads the phrase " may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction in this state " in § 8-21B-13 as making the venue for violations of the AHEDA exclusive in Alabama.”
Cowin Equip. Co. v. Terex USA, LLC (Ex parte Terex USA, LLC), 260 So. 3d 813 (Ala. 2018).
· cites it 8× “) Specifically, Terex argues in its petition that Cowin reads the phrase " may bring a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction in this state " in § 8-21B-13 as making the venue for violations of the AHEDA exclusive in Alabama.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.