Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 23.05.160 (2026)

Notice of wage payments

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 23.05.160. Notice of wage payments.
An employer shall notify an employee in writing at the time of hiring of the day and place of payment, and the rate of pay, and of any change with respect to these items on the payday before the time of change. An employer may give this notice by posting a statement of the facts, and keeping it posted conspicuously at or near the place of work where the statement can be seen by each employee as the employee comes or goes to the place of work.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1981–2019 · leading case: Dresser Indus., Inc. v. Alaska Dep't of Labor, 633 P.2d 998 (Alaska 1981).
Dresser Indus., Inc. v. Alaska Dep't of Labor, 633 P.2d 998 (Alaska 1981). · cites it 3× “The predicates which served as the Administrator’s basis in adopting the challenged regulation were: (A) The ‘fluctuating work week' is not applicable under the Alaska Act because, (1) AS 23.05.160 requires an employee to be told of his ‘rate of pay’ at the time of hire and of…”
State, Dep't of Labor, Wage & Hour Div. v. Univ. of Alaska, 664 P.2d 575 (Alaska 1983). · cites it 2× “AS 23.05.160. Construing the term "wage claim" in light of AS 23.”
Piquniq Mgmt. Corp. v. Reeves, 965 P.2d 732 (Alaska 1998). “Changes to the pay schedule of a salaried- employee must conform to the provisions of AS 23.05.160. 8 The second subparagraph applies in default of the first; it requires that, in the absence of an employment contract complying with subparagraph (a)(1), the worker’s salary must…”
Lane v. United Road Servs. Midwest (D. Alaska 2019). ““[A]n employer shall (1) annually certify that the rate of overtime pay for each route has been reviewed and found to be appropriate; and (2) post a copy of the annual certification and the rate of overtime pay for each route in a conspicuous place where each driver may review…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.