green
Positive treatment
11.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Anderson v. Houston
(8×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
See, also, In re Roach, supra note 14 (Chambers, J., concurring). [43] White, supra note 15 ; United States v. Merritt, 478 F. Supp. 804 (D.D.C. 1979); Hartley v. State, 50 Ala. App. 414 , 279 So. 2d 585 (1973) (quoting White, supra note 15 ). [44] Schwichtenberg, supra note 19. [45] Id. at 579, 951 P.2d at 454. [46] Id. [47] In re Roach, supra note 14, 150 Wash. 2d at 38 , 74 P.3d at 139 (Chambers, J., concurring). [48] Texel, supra note 2 , 230 Neb. at 814 , 433 N.W.2d at 544 . [49] In re Roach, supra note 14, 150 Wash. 2d at 38 , 74 P.3d at 139 (Chambers, J. concurring). [50] Com. v. Blair,…
SPECIAL FUND DIVISION
v.
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA/ST. CHARLES COMPANY
v.
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA/ST. CHARLES COMPANY
No. CV-97-0322-PR.
Arizona Supreme Court.
Dec 16, 1997.
Published
ORDERED: Petition for Review GRANTED.
FURTHER ORDERED: The case is submitted to the Court without oral argument.