A. Each board shall cause written minutes of its proceedings to be prepared pursuant to section 38-431.01.
B. The clerk of the board shall maintain and permanently preserve the official copy of the minutes in accordance with section 39-101.
C. The full minutes of proceedings, which need not be a verbatim transcript nor include exhibits, shall be made available to the public pursuant to section 38-431.01. The minutes shall also be made available at the office of the clerk of the board and the public libraries in the county.
D. The minutes shall include all demands and warrants approved by the board in excess of one thousand dollars and multiple demands and warrants from a single supplier or individual under one thousand dollars whose cumulative total exceeds one thousand dollars in a single reporting period.
Notes of Decisions
Arizona Newspapers Ass'n. v. Superior Court, 694 P.2d 1174 (Ariz. 1985).
· cites it 23× “On August 3, 1984, during the pendency of this action before this court, an amendment to A.R.S. § 11-217 became effective, indisputably mandating newspaper publication of county boards of supervisors proceedings.”
Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal Cnty., 51 P.3d 342 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
· cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 11-217(B). In addition, A.R.S. § 11-221 provides that “[t]he books, records and accounts of the board shall be kept at the office of the clerk of the board, and in his care, and shall be open to public inspection.”
Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima Cnty., 811 P.2d 22 (Ariz. 1991).
· cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 11-217. The referendum statutes, taken as a whole, contemplate a thirty-day period for challengers to file referendum petitions.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 11-217(B) — 1 case
Robson Ranch Mountains, L.L. C. v. Pinal Cnty., 51 P.3d 342 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2002).
“” A.R.S. § 11-217(B). In addition, A.R.S. § 11-221 provides that “[t]he books, records and accounts of the board shall be kept at the office of the clerk of the board, and in his care, and shall be open to public inspection.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.