Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1865

Fees and costs

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Fees and costs shall be the same as in civil appeals docketed before the supreme court and shall be equally divided between the parties unless otherwise ordered by the certifying court in its order of certification.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1997 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court (1997) arizctapp · cites it 2× “1996) requires the ADOT Director to have an appraisal report justifying the economic basis for the condemnation of any property for transportation purposes valued at over $2500.”
Beverly Carroll, Appellants-Plaintiffs v. United States of America, Appellee-Defendant (1991) ca9 “Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 12-1865. Forcing the United States to participate in a proceeding where it will be required to submit to the jurisdiction of, and pay a fee to, a state instrumentality violates, principles established as far back as McCulloch .”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-1865(1) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Miller v. Superior Court (1997) arizctapp “1996) requires the ADOT Director to have an appraisal report justifying the economic basis for the condemnation of any property for transportation purposes valued at over $2500.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.