Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-1103 (2026)

Supplementary general principles of law applicable

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this title, the principles of law and equity supplement its provisions.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 10 cases, 1979–2017 · leading case: Matter of Est. of Brown, 670 P.2d 414 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Matter of Est. of Brown, 670 P.2d 414 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 8× “All of this, they argue, was changed by the adoption of A.R.S. § 14-1103, which reads as follows: Supplementary general principles of law applicable.”

Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n v. Pac. Fin. Ass'n, 388 P.3d 556 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 3× “” A.R.S. § 14-1103 (2016). Section 14-10106 states that “[t]he common law of trusts and principles of equity supplement this chapter, except to the extent modified by this chapter or another statute of this state.”

In Re Est. of Friedman, 177 P.3d 290 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 3× “” A.R.S. 14-1103. With the probate court’s power to apply the principles of law and equity in mind, we examine *555 the reasons behind the APSA and especially the immunity offered persons who make allegations of elder abuse pursuant to A.”

Burch & Cracchiolo, P.A. v. First Nat'l Bank, 670 P.2d 414 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 8× “All of this, they argue, was changed by the adoption of A.R.S. § 14-1103, which reads as follows: Supplementary general principles of law applicable.”

Matter of Est. of Shano, 869 P.2d 1203 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “section 14-1103 [3] had expanded the jurisdiction of the probate court over the granting of fees.”

Kinnear v. Finegan, 672 P.2d 986 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “We recognize that although appellant was initially appointed to serve without bond, the trial court may nevertheless require a bond where any interested person petitions the court and presents reasonable proof that a loss may be incurred by the estate. See A.R.S. § 14-3603(B).…”

Matter of Est. of Groves, 788 P.2d 127 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Appellee next contends that the court had authority pursuant ' to A.R.S. § 14-1103. That statutes provides: *396 Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this title, the principles of law and equity supplement its provisions.”

Marvin Johnson, P.C. v. Superior Court, 887 P.2d 1 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 14-1103 (“[u]nless displaced by the particular provisions of this title, the principles of law and equity supplement its provisions”).”

Fiduciary Servs., Inc. v. Shano, 869 P.2d 1203 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). “section 14-1103 3 had expanded the jurisdiction of the probate court over the granting of fees.”

Buhler v. Adkins, 607 P.2d 970 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). “Moreover, new probate code § 14-1103 lends further support for this view because it states: “Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this title, the principles of law and equity supplement its provisions.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.