Any part of the intestate estate not passing to the decedent's surviving spouse under section 14-2102 or the entire intestate estate if there is no surviving spouse passes in the following order to the following persons who survive the decedent:
1. To the decedent's descendants by representation.
2. If there is no surviving descendant, to the decedent's parents equally if both survive or to the surviving parent.
3. If there is no surviving descendant or parent, to the descendants of the decedent's parents or either of them by representation.
4. If there is no surviving descendant, parent or descendant of a parent, but the decedent is survived by one or more grandparents or descendants of grandparents, half of the estate passes to the decedent's paternal grandparents equally if both survive or to the surviving paternal grandparent or the descendants of the decedent's paternal grandparents or either of them if both are deceased with the descendants taking by representation. The other half passes to the decedent's maternal relatives in the same manner. If there is no surviving grandparent or descendant of a grandparent on either the paternal or the maternal side, the entire estate passes to the decedent's relatives on the other side in the same manner as the half.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
5
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2022 · leading case:
Arnold Davis v. Guam, 932 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2019).
Arnold Davis v. Guam, 932 F.3d 822 (9th Cir. 2019).
“, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2103 (requiring passing of property based on lineage in the absence of a surviving spouse); Cal.”
Gillett-Netting v. Barnhart, 231 F. Supp. 2d 961 (D. Ariz. 2002).
· cites it 2× “Under A.R.S. § 14-2103, “[a]ny part of the intestate estate not passing to the decedent’s surviving spouse .”
Hoyer v. Dougherty (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
· cites it 12× “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED determining and instructing the Personal Representative that pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 14-2103(1) and 14-2114(B), and by representation, [Klifton] is entitled to inherit the share of his mother, [Lorna], in the intestate [e]state of [Verle].”
Wagoner v. Aleman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
· cites it 4× “Aleman Cannot Inherit from Jones under A.R.S. § 14-2103 ¶15 Because the 2012 Draft is not valid, the trial court correctly found that Jones died intestate.”
Davis v. Guam (D. Guam 2019).
“, Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2103 (requiring passing of property based on lineage in the absence of a surviving spouse); Cal.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-2103(1) — 2 cases
Hoyer v. Dougherty (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022).
“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED determining and instructing the Personal Representative that pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 14-2103(1) and 14-2114(B), and by representation, [Klifton] is entitled to inherit the share of his mother, [Lorna], in the intestate [e]state of [Verle].”
Wagoner v. Aleman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2015).
“Aleman Cannot Inherit from Jones under A.R.S. § 14-2103 ¶15 Because the 2012 Draft is not valid, the trial court correctly found that Jones died intestate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.