Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-326
Capacity to sue and be sued and to hold and convey property
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The governing board of a school district shall in the district name, as specified in section 15-441, subsection B:
1. Sue and be sued.
2. Hold and convey property for the use and benefit of the district.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2003–2009 · leading case: Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County (2003)
“See Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 15-326(1). This fact was underscored in this litigation by the absence of the Arizona Attorney General’s participation in the lawsuit; it is defended by the School District alone.”
Batty v. Glendale Union High School District No. 205 (2009)
““A governing board may delegate in writing to a superintendent, principal or head teacher the authority to prescribe procedures that are consistent with the governing board’s policies.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-326(1) — 2 cases
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County (2003)
“See Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 15-326(1). This fact was underscored in this litigation by the absence of the Arizona Attorney General’s participation in the lawsuit; it is defended by the School District alone.”
Batty v. Glendale Union High School District No. 205 (2009)
““A governing board may delegate in writing to a superintendent, principal or head teacher the authority to prescribe procedures that are consistent with the governing board’s policies.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-326(2) — 1 case
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County (2003)
“See Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 15-326(1). This fact was underscored in this litigation by the absence of the Arizona Attorney General’s participation in the lawsuit; it is defended by the School District alone.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.