Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 15

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-543

Appeal from decision of board

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The decision of the governing board is final unless the certificated teacher files, within thirty days after the date of the decision, an appeal with the superior court in the county within which he was employed.

B. The decision of the governing board may be reviewed by the court in the same manner as the decision made in accordance with section 41-783. The proceeding shall be set for hearing at the earliest possible date and shall take precedence over all other cases, except older matters of the same character and matters to which special precedence is otherwise given by law.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 1972–2019 · leading case: Anderson v. VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anderson v. VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL (2012) arizctapp · cites it 30× “¶ 6 In supplemental briefing permitted by this court, Anderson asserted we may hear his appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 and several other laws supposedly incorporated in it by reference.”
Pavlik v. Chinle Unified School District No. 24 (1999) arizctapp · cites it 4× “For example, any dismissal must be supported by good cause, and findings must be made on the record so that they are reviewable.”
Siglin v. Kayenta Unified School District No. 27 (1982) arizctapp · cites it 6× “Siglin appealed the board’s decision pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 (formerly *235 § 15-264) to the Navajo County Superior Court.”
Fulton v. Dysart Unified School District No. 89 (1982) arizctapp · cites it 4× “Additionally, A.R.S. § 41-785(F) provides in part that: “The court shall review the hearing on the basis of the transcript and exhibits,” with certain exceptions not pertinent here.”
Rouse v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48 (1987) arizctapp · cites it 2× “Rouse appealed this decision to Superior Court, pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543. The trial court affirmed the board’s dismissal.”
Welch v. Bd. of Ed. of Chandler U. Sch. Dist. (1983) arizctapp · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 15-543 provides for a review in the same manner as decisions made in accordance with A.”
Stanton v. Globe Unified School District No. 1 (1985) arizctapp · cites it 9× “” The only issue we need to decide is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the 30 day time limit set forth in A.R.S. § 15-543 applies to this case and thus deprives the court of jurisdiction.”
State of Michigan v. First National Bank of Arizona (1972) arizctapp · cites it 2× “We therefore hold that under the facts of this case A.R.S. § 15-543(3) has no application. Michigan’s last contention that its cause of action against the estate of the deceased did not accrue until discovery of assets is based upon the following Michigan statute: “The attorney…”
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 (2012) arizctapp · cites it 28× “¶6 In supplemental briefing permitted by this court, Anderson asserted we may hear his appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 and several other laws supposedly incorporated in it by reference.”
Chavez v. Roosevelt School (2019) arizctapp · cites it 9× “The provisions of A.R.S. § 15-543 “require the teacher with a violation sufficiently serious to lead to dismissal .”
Pusd v. Hon. mcclennen/mckee (2014) arizctapp · cites it 8× “2012), this Court held that, under A.R.S. § 15-543, there is no right to appeal beyond the superior court in a Teacher Tenure Act disciplinary action.”
Mohr v. Murphy Elementary (2014) arizctapp · cites it 2× “City of 9 Even if we considered Mohr an administrator under chapter 5, article 3, this court has held that § 15-543 provides only a limited right to appeal to the superior court, which does not include “a right of appeal to this court.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-543(3) — 1 case
State of Michigan v. First National Bank of Arizona (1972) arizctapp “We therefore hold that under the facts of this case A.R.S. § 15-543(3) has no application. Michigan’s last contention that its cause of action against the estate of the deceased did not accrue until discovery of assets is based upon the following Michigan statute: “The attorney…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-543(A) — 4 cases
Anderson v. VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL (2012) arizctapp “¶ 6 In supplemental briefing permitted by this court, Anderson asserted we may hear his appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 and several other laws supposedly incorporated in it by reference.”
Stanton v. Globe Unified School District No. 1 (1985) arizctapp “” The only issue we need to decide is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the 30 day time limit set forth in A.R.S. § 15-543 applies to this case and thus deprives the court of jurisdiction.”
Chavez v. Roosevelt School (2019) arizctapp “The provisions of A.R.S. § 15-543 “require the teacher with a violation sufficiently serious to lead to dismissal .”
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 (2012) arizctapp “¶6 In supplemental briefing permitted by this court, Anderson asserted we may hear his appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 and several other laws supposedly incorporated in it by reference.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 15-543(B) — 3 cases
Anderson v. VALLEY UNION HIGH SCHOOL (2012) arizctapp “¶ 6 In supplemental briefing permitted by this court, Anderson asserted we may hear his appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 and several other laws supposedly incorporated in it by reference.”
Richard Anderson v. Valley Union High School District 22 (2012) arizctapp “¶6 In supplemental briefing permitted by this court, Anderson asserted we may hear his appeal pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-543 and several other laws supposedly incorporated in it by reference.”
Pusd v. Hon. mcclennen/mckee (2014) arizctapp “2012), this Court held that, under A.R.S. § 15-543, there is no right to appeal beyond the superior court in a Teacher Tenure Act disciplinary action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.