Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 20-442 (2026)

Unfair trade practices prohibited

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No person shall engage in this state in any trade practice which is prohibited by this article, or defined in this article as, or determined pursuant to this article to be, an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance.  

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1967–2023 · leading case: Ward v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies, 731 P.2d 106 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
Ward v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Companies, 731 P.2d 106 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “, A.R.S. § 20-442 (“No person shall engage in this state in any trade practice which is .”
K & Lee Corp. v. Scottsdale Ins., 769 F. Supp. 870 (E.D. Pa. 1991). “Arizona Insurance Code Claim Plaintiff has also asserted a claim under the Arizona Insurance Code, Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. §§ 20-442, 20-443. 5 Plaintiff contends that defendant violated the statute by (1) failing to act promptly with respect to claims, (2) failing to adopt…”
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Nat'l Sec., Inc., a Corp., 387 F.2d 25 (9th Cir. 1967). “See Ariz.Rev. Stat. §§ 20-442 — 20-456. The section of the Arizona Insurance Code relating to mergers states: “A.”
Galvan v. Union Ins. Co. (D. Ariz. 2023). · cites it 6× “) 14 Plaintiff has not yet been compensated under his UIM coverage. (FAC ¶ 36.) In the 15 FAC, Plaintiff alleges breach of contract (Count 1), breach of the duty of good faith and 16 fair dealing (Count 2), unfair trade practices under A.”
Emergency Grp. of Arizona Prof'l Corp. v. United Healthcare Inc. (D. Ariz. 2020). · cites it 2× “1 asserted six claims for relief originating under state law: breach of implied-in-fact 2 contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment, 3 unfair competition under A.R.S. § 20-442, consumer fraud under A.R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.