Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-806.01 (2026)

Trustor's right to transfer; transfer fee limit; interest rate increase limit

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Nothing in this article shall be construed to prevent or limit the right of a trustor to transfer his interest in the trust property, or authorize a beneficiary or trustee to arbitrarily withhold his consent to a transfer by the trustor of his interest in the trust property.

B. When a trustor transfers his interest in the trust property, no beneficiary or trustee shall charge a fee on the transfer of more than one hundred dollars or one per cent of the balance due on the obligation secured by the trust deed, whichever is greater.

C. When a trustor transfers his interest in the trust property, no beneficiary or trustee shall increase the interest rate on the obligation secured by such trust deed unless the transferring trustor is released from all liability thereon and in no event shall the amount of such increase exceed one-half of one percent per annum more than the interest rate paid by the transferring trustor.

D. This section shall be applicable only to trust property of two and one-half acres or less which is not used for commercial purposes and which is limited to and utilized for dwelling units, not to exceed four single-family units.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1978–1991 · leading case: Scappaticci v. Sw. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 662 P.2d 131 (Ariz. 1983).
Scappaticci v. Sw. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 662 P.2d 131 (Ariz. 1983). · cites it 8× “The appellees filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the grounds that appellants’ due-on-sale policy constituted an unreasonable restraint on alienation, violated public policy and was impermissible under A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The trial court granted the motion and entered…”
Mid Kansas Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Dev. Corp., 804 P.2d 1310 (Ariz. 1991). · cites it 4× “§ 33-814(G): If trust property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling is sold pursuant to the trustee's power of sale, no action may be maintained to recover any difference between the…”
Phillips v. Superior Court, 692 P.2d 1038 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 14× “This section shall be applicable only to trust property of two and one-half acres or less which is not used for commercial purposes and which is limited to and utilized for dwelling units, not to exceed four single-family units.”
Patton v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, Etc., 578 P.2d 152 (Ariz. 1978). · cites it 6× “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The record suggests that First Federal may have waived its right to obtain information from Toy.”
Patton v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Phoenix, 578 P.2d 152 (Ariz. 1978). · cites it 4× “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The record suggests that First Federal may have waived its right to obtain information from Toy.”
In Re Bisbee, 754 P.2d 1135 (Ariz. 1988). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01(A). As stated in Brant : [T]he bare legal title held by the trustee is very tenuous, and may at any time prior to sale be terminated by unilateral action of the beneficiary.”
Snow v. W. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 730 P.2d 197 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 6× “Although the Patton court relied to some *24 extent on A.R.S. § 33-806.01, which specifically concerns residential deeds of trust, that section clearly was not the sine qua non of its holding.”
Read v. Arizona Dept. of Revenue, 803 P.2d 944 (Ariz. T.C. 1991). · cites it 2× “1988); see also A.R.S. § 33-806.01(A). Because Read's predecessor in interest "enjoy[ed] all other incidents of ownership," Read did not stand in the same position as his predecessor at the time the right to appeal the property's valuation became ripe.”
Mid Kansas Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Dev. Corp., 787 P.2d 132 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “For example, the legislature defined trust property in A.R.S. § 33-806.01(D), which it enacted in the same bill with A.”
Bisbee v. Sec. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. of Norman, 754 P.2d 1135 (Ariz. 1988). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01(A). As stated in Brant : [T]he bare legal title held by the trustee is very tenuous, and may at any time prior to sale be terminated by unilateral action of the beneficiary.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-806.01(0): 1 case
Patton v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Phoenix, 578 P.2d 152 (Ariz. 1978). “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The record suggests that First Federal may have waived its right to obtain information from Toy.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-806.01(A): 6 cases
Scappaticci v. Sw. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 662 P.2d 131 (Ariz. 1983). “The appellees filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the grounds that appellants’ due-on-sale policy constituted an unreasonable restraint on alienation, violated public policy and was impermissible under A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The trial court granted the motion and entered…”
In Re Bisbee, 754 P.2d 1135 (Ariz. 1988). “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01(A). As stated in Brant : [T]he bare legal title held by the trustee is very tenuous, and may at any time prior to sale be terminated by unilateral action of the beneficiary.”
Read v. Arizona Dept. of Revenue, 803 P.2d 944 (Ariz. T.C. 1991). “1988); see also A.R.S. § 33-806.01(A). Because Read's predecessor in interest "enjoy[ed] all other incidents of ownership," Read did not stand in the same position as his predecessor at the time the right to appeal the property's valuation became ripe.”
Patton v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, Etc., 578 P.2d 152 (Ariz. 1978). “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The record suggests that First Federal may have waived its right to obtain information from Toy.”
Snow v. W. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 730 P.2d 197 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “Although the Patton court relied to some *24 extent on A.R.S. § 33-806.01, which specifically concerns residential deeds of trust, that section clearly was not the sine qua non of its holding.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-806.01(C): 2 cases
Patton v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, Etc., 578 P.2d 152 (Ariz. 1978). “See A.R.S. § 33-806.01. The record suggests that First Federal may have waived its right to obtain information from Toy.”
Phillips v. Superior Court, 692 P.2d 1038 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “This section shall be applicable only to trust property of two and one-half acres or less which is not used for commercial purposes and which is limited to and utilized for dwelling units, not to exceed four single-family units.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 33-806.01(D): 2 cases
Mid Kansas Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Dev. Corp., 804 P.2d 1310 (Ariz. 1991). “§ 33-814(G): If trust property of two and one-half acres or less which is limited to and utilized for either a single one-family or single two-family dwelling is sold pursuant to the trustee's power of sale, no action may be maintained to recover any difference between the…”
Mid Kansas Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Dev. Corp., 787 P.2d 132 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1989). “For example, the legislature defined trust property in A.R.S. § 33-806.01(D), which it enacted in the same bill with A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.