Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 38

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-341

Accusation by grand jury

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. An accusation, in writing, against a county, district or precinct officer for wilful or corrupt misconduct in office may be presented by a grand jury of the county for or in which the officer accused is elected or appointed.

B. The accusation shall state the offense charged in ordinary and concise language, and without repetition.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1970–2008 · leading case: Hounshell v. White
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hounshell v. White (2008) arizctapp · cites it 2× “” AR.S. § 38-341(A) (2001). Additionally, such elected officers are still subject to the criminal justice system.”
State v. Burr (1970) arizctapp · cites it 5× “This is an appeal by the State of Arizona from an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion to quash an accusation returned by a Pima County Grand Jury pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-341 et seq. We are called upon to determine whether the proceedings in the trial court were…”
State v. Felix (1970) arizctapp · cites it 2× “This is an appeal by the State of Arizona from an order of the trial court granting the motion of defendant to quash an accusation returned by a Pima County Grand Jury pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-341 et seq. We are called upon to determine whether the proceeding is criminal in…”
State v. Williams (1970) arizctapp · cites it 2× “This is an appeal by the State of Arizona from an order of the trial court granting the motion of defendant to quash an accusation returned by a Pima County Grand Jury pursuant to A.R.S. § 38-341 et seq. We are called upon to determine whether the proceeding is criminal in…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-341(A) — 1 case
Hounshell v. White (2008) arizctapp “” AR.S. § 38-341(A) (2001). Additionally, such elected officers are still subject to the criminal justice system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.