A. Any person making a complaint, furnishing a report, information or records required or authorized by this chapter or otherwise participating in the program authorized by this chapter or in a judicial or administrative proceeding or investigation resulting from reports, information or records submitted or obtained pursuant to this chapter is immune from any civil or criminal liability by reason of such action, unless the person acted with malice or unless such person has been charged with or is suspected of abusing, exploiting or neglecting the vulnerable adult in question. Except as provided in subsection B of this section the physician-patient privilege, husband-wife privilege or any privilege except the attorney-client privilege, provided for by professions such as the practice of social work or nursing covered by law or a code of ethics regarding practitioner-client confidences, both as they relate to the competency of the witness and to the exclusion of confidential communications, shall not pertain in any civil or criminal litigation in which a vulnerable adult's exploitation, abuse or neglect is an issue nor in any judicial or administrative proceeding resulting from a report, information or records submitted or obtained pursuant to section 46-454 nor in any investigation of a vulnerable adult's exploitation, abuse or neglect conducted by a peace officer or a protective services worker.
B. In any civil or criminal litigation in which incapacitation, abuse, exploitation or neglect of a vulnerable adult is an issue, a clergyman or priest shall not, without his consent, be examined as a witness concerning any confession made to him in his role as a clergyman or a priest in the course of the discipline enjoined by the church to which he belongs.
Notes of Decisions
In Re Estate of Friedman (2008)
arizctapp · cites it 5×
“We conclude, however, that A.R.S. § 46-453(A) provides the appropriate balance to use between administration and distribution of estates under the probate code and the APSA.”
State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner (2019)
ariz · cites it 2×
“§ 23-908(D) ("[I]nformation obtained by any physician or surgeon examining or treating an injured person shall not be considered a privileged communication .”
Caravetta v. Banner (2017)
arizctapp · cites it 2×
“Moreover, Caravetta failed to state a claim for violation of APSA on the asserted grounds because neither A.R.S. § 46-453 — governing the immunity of a person making an APSA complaint and non-privileged communications with a clergyman or priest 2 CARAVETTA v.”
rs/se v. Hon. thompson/vanders (2019)
arizctapp · cites it 2×
“, A.R.S. § 46-453(A) (exempting the privilege in cases involving “a vulnerable adult’s exploitation, abuse or neglect”); A.”
Snyder v. banner/goel (2014)
arizctapp · cites it 2×
“Appellant’s counsel conceded at oral argument before the superior court that Appellees had “a right to call APS” initially, but argued that later reports to the agency were defamatory. Whether those subsequent communications are actionable depends on whether Appellant can…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 46-453(A) — 4 cases
In Re Estate of Friedman (2008)
arizctapp
“We conclude, however, that A.R.S. § 46-453(A) provides the appropriate balance to use between administration and distribution of estates under the probate code and the APSA.”
State v. Chalice Renee Zeitner (2019)
ariz
“§ 23-908(D) ("[I]nformation obtained by any physician or surgeon examining or treating an injured person shall not be considered a privileged communication .”
rs/se v. Hon. thompson/vanders (2019)
arizctapp
“, A.R.S. § 46-453(A) (exempting the privilege in cases involving “a vulnerable adult’s exploitation, abuse or neglect”); A.”
Snyder v. banner/goel (2014)
arizctapp
“Appellant’s counsel conceded at oral argument before the superior court that Appellees had “a right to call APS” initially, but argued that later reports to the agency were defamatory. Whether those subsequent communications are actionable depends on whether Appellant can…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.