Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2720 (2026)

Effect of "cancellation" or "rescission" on claims for antecedent breach

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless the contrary intention clearly appears, expressions of "cancellation" or "rescission" of the contract or the like shall not be construed as a renunciation or discharge of any claim in damages for an antecedent breach.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C., 55 P.3d 763 (Ariz. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C., 55 P.3d 763 (Ariz. 2002). · cites it 3× “”) § 12-1838 (1994) (allowing “further relief" in a declaratory judgment case); A.R.S. § 47-2720 (1997) (Uniform Commercial Code provision stating that rescission of a contract “shall not be construed as a renunciation or discharge of any claim in damages”).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.