Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 8

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515

Time limits on placement in receiving home; court orders

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. In the absence of a juvenile court order, a child shall not remain in a receiving foster home for a period of more than three weeks.

B. Juvenile court orders extending receiving foster home placement beyond three weeks shall be reviewed by the juvenile court at least once each week, beginning one week from the date of the order. At the time of this review, the juvenile court shall either reaffirm or withdraw the order.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases, 1981–2015 · leading case: Jennifer B. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jennifer B. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (1997) arizctapp · cites it 6× “For this proposition, the aunt cites to A.R.S. § 8-515(H)(now renumbered and codified at A.”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-500116 (1989) arizctapp · cites it 12× “A.R.S. § 8-515 provides in part: C. When a child has remained in foster care for a period of one year, the juvenile court shall conduct a review of the dispositional order for such child.”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312 (1994) arizctapp · cites it 4× “A parent denied and redenied control over his or her children must have the right to appeal the initial and subsequent denials____ What this means is that an aggrieved party may appeal an order issued pursuant to the juvenile court’s periodic review of a determination of…”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6236 (1994) arizctapp · cites it 6× “Section 8-515 requires the juvenile court to review dependency cases involving out-of-home placement at least once per year.”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-57445 (1984) arizctapp · cites it 10× “After such initial review, the juvenile court shall conduct additional reviews of a dispositional order which continues use of foster care at least once each year.”
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-8545 (1984) ariz · cites it 2× “What it means is that an aggrieved party may appeal an order issued pursuant to the juvenile court’s periodic review of a determination of dependency or of a custodial arrangement, see A.R.S. § 8-515(C), (D). Though this may impose an additional burden on our Court of Appeals,…”
Rourk v. State (1991) arizctapp · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 8-515. Natural parents whose children are living in foster homes retain many legal rights and responsibilities relating to their children, including the right to visitation.”
Tinsley v. McKay (2015) azd · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 8-515(A). DCS may remove a child from a foster home without prior court approval.”
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561 (1981) arizctapp · cites it 4× “To that end the Department of Economic Security shall establish a program of counseling and rehabilitation of the parents.”
In re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. SV89-00023 and DP8900018 (1990) arizctapp · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 8-515(H). By accepting the stipulation without considering what efforts had or could be made toward reunification or as to the child’s best interests, the juvenile *417 court abdicated its responsibilities to the child.”
Matter of Cochise County Juv. Dep. Action (1990) arizctapp · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 8-515(H). By accepting the stipulation without considering what efforts had or could be made toward reunification or as to the child's best interests, the juvenile *417 court abdicated its responsibilities to the child.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(A) — 1 case
Tinsley v. McKay (2015) azd “A.R.S. § 8-515(A). DCS may remove a child from a foster home without prior court approval.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(C) — 4 cases
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-500116 (1989) arizctapp “A.R.S. § 8-515 provides in part: C. When a child has remained in foster care for a period of one year, the juvenile court shall conduct a review of the dispositional order for such child.”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-57445 (1984) arizctapp “After such initial review, the juvenile court shall conduct additional reviews of a dispositional order which continues use of foster care at least once each year.”
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6236 (1994) arizctapp “Section 8-515 requires the juvenile court to review dependency cases involving out-of-home placement at least once per year.”
In Re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-8545 (1984) ariz “What it means is that an aggrieved party may appeal an order issued pursuant to the juvenile court’s periodic review of a determination of dependency or of a custodial arrangement, see A.R.S. § 8-515(C), (D). Though this may impose an additional burden on our Court of Appeals,…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(D)(2) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-57445 (1984) arizctapp “After such initial review, the juvenile court shall conduct additional reviews of a dispositional order which continues use of foster care at least once each year.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(D)(3) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JD-6236 (1994) arizctapp “Section 8-515 requires the juvenile court to review dependency cases involving out-of-home placement at least once per year.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(F) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-5312 (1994) arizctapp “A parent denied and redenied control over his or her children must have the right to appeal the initial and subsequent denials____ What this means is that an aggrieved party may appeal an order issued pursuant to the juvenile court’s periodic review of a determination of…”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(H) — 4 cases
Jennifer B. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (1997) arizctapp “For this proposition, the aunt cites to A.R.S. § 8-515(H)(now renumbered and codified at A.”
In re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Dependency Action Nos. SV89-00023 and DP8900018 (1990) arizctapp “See A.R.S. § 8-515(H). By accepting the stipulation without considering what efforts had or could be made toward reunification or as to the child’s best interests, the juvenile *417 court abdicated its responsibilities to the child.”
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-561 (1981) arizctapp “To that end the Department of Economic Security shall establish a program of counseling and rehabilitation of the parents.”
Matter of Cochise County Juv. Dep. Action (1990) arizctapp “See A.R.S. § 8-515(H). By accepting the stipulation without considering what efforts had or could be made toward reunification or as to the child's best interests, the juvenile *417 court abdicated its responsibilities to the child.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 8-515(K) — 1 case
Jennifer B. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security (1997) arizctapp “For this proposition, the aunt cites to A.R.S. § 8-515(H)(now renumbered and codified at A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.