green
Positive treatment
14.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commerce Bank/Harrisburg, N.A. v. Kessler
Stevenson v. General Motors Corp., 513 Pa. 411 , 521 A.2d 413 (1987); Schaffer v. Litton Systems, Inc., 372 Pa.Super. 123 , 539 A.2d 360 (1988); In re Marino’s Estate, 440 Pa. 492 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Duttry v. Talkish
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970). 483 Pa. at 73 , 394 A.2d at 545 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Schaffer v. Litton Systems, Inc.
Discouraging interlocutory appeals avoids “piecemeal determinations and the consequent protraction of litigation.” In re Marino[’s] Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970) (quoting Sullivan v. Philadelphia, 378 Pa. 648, 649 , 107 A.2d 854, 855 (1954)).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Wall v. Wall
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, Stevenson v. General Motors Corp., 513 Pa. 411 , 521 A.2d 413, 416 (1987); Pugar v. Greco, 483 Pa. 68, 75 , 394 A.2d 542, 545-6 (1978); Fadgen v. Lenkner, 469 Pa. 272, 289 , 365 A.2d 147, 155 (1976); Piltzer v. Independence Federal Savings and Loan Association of Philadelphia, 456 Pa. 402, 406 , 319 A.2d 677, 678 (1974); Estate of Marino, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970); Adcox v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Casualty Insurance Co., 419 Pa. 170 , 175, 213 A.2d 366, 368 (1965); Werner v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways, 416 Pa. 356, 359 , 206 A.2d 317, 319 (1965)…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kirsch v. PARKING AUTH. OF NEW CASTLE
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970); Marshall v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, 76 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 205 , 463 A.2d 1215 (1983).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stevenson v. General Motors Corp.
(2×)
Discouraging interlocutory appeals avoids “piecemeal determinations and the consequent protraction of litigation.” Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970) (quoting Sullivan v. Philadelphia, 378 Pa. 648, 649 , 107 A.2d 854, 855 (1954)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
D'Aloiso v. Chung
The pertinent guidelines have been set forth in the following manner: In other words, “[a]n order is not interlocutory if it precludes a party from presenting the merits of his claim to the lower court.” Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dash v. Wilap Corp.
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gray v. State Farm Insurance
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth, Department of Transportation v. Rollins Outdoor Advertising Co.
Thus an order is final and appealable if it “precludes a party from presenting the merits of his claim to the lower court.” Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Veno v. Meredith
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).” Id., 483 Pa. at 73 , 394 A.2d at 545 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gordon v. Gordon
(2×)
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Husted v. Board of Directors of Wellsboro Area School District
In other words, “ [a]n order is not interlocutory if it precludes a party from presenting the merits of his claim to the lower court.” Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pugar v. Greco
Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Altemose Construction Co. v. Building & Construction Trades Council
(2×)
A party is not “out of court” unless he is precluded from “presenting the merits of his claim to the lower court.” Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
LANSDOWNE BY LANSDOWNE v. GC Murphy Co.
See Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970). *453 Instantly, the lower court entered an order striking the appellant’s complaint in trespass for failure to comply with Pa.R.Civ.P. 1037(a). 1 Therefore, with the dismissal of the complaint, no one would dispute that the appellant was “out of court” with his trespass action so as to be foreclosed from presenting the merits of his case before a tribunal authorized to hear the same.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Schwartz v. Schwartz
See also Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645 , 646 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Brien v. O'Brien
See also Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645, 646 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fried v. Fried
(2×)
See also Marino Estate, 440 Pa. 492, 494 , 269 A.2d 645 , 646 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yoyart
v.
Rubinosky et ux.
v.
Rubinosky et ux.
Appeal, No. 398.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 9, 1970.
John P. Yatsko, for appellants., Herman H. Yaffee, with him Randolph A. Warden, for appellee.
Bell, Brien, Cohen, Eagen, Pomeroy, Roberts.
Published
Opinion
Per Curiam,Decree affirmed. Appellants to bear costs.
Mr. Justice Jones took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.