green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Jordan, N.
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 421 A.2d 374, 379 , (Pa. Super. 1980), affirmed, 461 A.2d 794 (Pa. 1983) (distinguishing cases such as Cherry, supra, and holding that reversible error did not occur because the prosecutor’s statements were of very limited duration and “were not part of an apparent attempt to focus the jury’s attention on issues not before them or invite them to render an unreasoned verdict”); see also Commonwealth v. Stafford, 749 A.2d 489, 499 (Pa. Super. 2000) (citing Clark, supra, when rejecting Stafford’s claim that the prosecutor violated “the ‘Golden Rule’ proh…
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Minnis, D.
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 421 A.2d 374, 378-79 (Pa. Super. 1980), aff'd mem., 461 A.2d 794 (Pa. 1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Vann, P.
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 421 A.2d 374, 378-79 (Pa. Super. 1980), aff'd mem., 461 A.2d 794 (Pa. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barr v. City & County of Philadelphia
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 280 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 , 421 A.2d 374 (1980), affirmed, 501 Pa. 393 , 461 A.2d 794 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Bright
(4×)
See Commonwealth v. Clark, 280 Pa.Super. 1 , 421 A.2d 374 , aff'd 501 Pa. 393 , 461 A.2d 794 (1980) (defendant's possession of a pocket knife five weeks after crime was relevant, despite victim's inability to testify that weapon used was a knife).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
James CLARK, Appellant.
v.
James CLARK, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jul 1, 1983.
Roberts, C.J., and Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Hutchinson and Zappala.
Published
John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals Div., Leonard Sosnou, for appellant.
Robert B. Lawler, Chief, Appeals Div., Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, for appellee.
Before ROBERTS, C.J., and NIX, LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON and ZAPPALA, JJ.
[*394] ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order of the Superior Court, 280 Pa.Super. 1, 421 A.2d 374, affirmed.