Commonwealth v. Hagerty, 550 A.2d 196 (Pa. 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Hagerty, 550 A.2d 196 (Pa. 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dunbar v. Rivello (pactcompllackaw, 2013-11-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dunbar v. Rivello
pactcompllackaw · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Crozer-Chester Medical Center v. May, 366 Pa. Super. 265, 269 , 531 A.2d 2, 5 (1987) (protesters held in contempt for violating injunction barring them “[f]rom photographing or attempting to photograph any staff member, employee, patient, business invitee or guests” of reproductive health and counseling center “while such person is upon, entering or leaving” that center), app. dismissed, 520 Pa. 62 , 550 A.2d 196 (1988). ‘”It is well established in Pennsylvania that a violation of the right of privacy is an actionable tort.’” Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Servi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
George HAGERTY
Appeal No. 41 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1988.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 14, 1988.
550 A.2d 196
John W. Packel, Chief, Appeals Div., Jeffrey P. Shender, Philadelphia, for appellant., Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Deputy Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Div., Philadelphia, Hugh J. Bums, Upper Darby, for appellee.
Flaherty, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Stout, Zappala.
Published

[*62] ORDER

PER CURIAM:

ORDER AFFIRMED.