neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.1 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Jay MOTT a/k/a Leroy Tillman
v.
Jay MOTT a/k/a Leroy Tillman
Appeal No. 107 W.D. Appeal Dkt., 1988.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 29, 1989.
Shelley Stark, Chief-Appellate Counsel, Office of the Public Defender, Pittsburgh, for appellant., Leonard N. Sosnov, Philadelphia, amicus curiae, for Defender Ass’n of Philadelphia., Robert E. Colville, Dist. Atty., Claire C. Capristo, Deputy Dist. Atty., Kemal Alexander Mericli, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pittsburgh, for appellee., George S. Leone, Asst. Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Unit, Philadelphia, amicus curiae, for PA Dist. Attorneys’ Ass’n.
Flaherty, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM:AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 1989, by concession of the Commonwealth as to the issue of improper jury instructions, a new trial is granted.