Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 568 A.2d 792 (Conn. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 568 A.2d 792 (Conn. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“rule in connecticut is that when a statement, accusatory in nature, made in the presence and hearing of an accused, is not denied or explained by him, it may be received into evidence as an admission on his part”
54 citation events (27 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rogers (connappct, 1998-09-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Rogers
Conn. App. Ct. · 1998 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
rule in connecticut is that when a statement, accusatory in nature, made in the presence and hearing of an accused, is not denied or explained by him, it may be received into evidence as an admission on his part
cited Cited "see" Gibson v. Jefferson Woods Community, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163 , 166–67, 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited Cited "see" JP Morgan Chase Bank v. GIANOPOULOS
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited Cited "see" Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 167 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
discussed Cited "see" Sargent v. Smith
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); see also Stein v. Hillebrand, 240 Conn. 35 , 43 n.7, 688 A.2d 1317 (1997); Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC, 189 Conn. 212, 218-19 , 455 A.2d 857 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Peters
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Torrice, 20 Conn. App. 75, 81 , 564 A.2d 330 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 794 (1989) (crime of risk of injury to child as interpreted by Schriver adequately explained where “[t]he trial court told the jury that it was not permitted to find the defendant guilty for committing ‘any act,’ but must find that he acted wilfully and ‘that he either intended the resulting injury to the victim, or he knew that the injury would occur, or that his conduct was of such a character that it demonstrated a reckless disregard of the consequences’ ”).
cited Cited "see" Connecticut National Bank v. L & R Realty
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Ed. 1990); J.
cited Cited "see" Dime Savings Bank of New York v. Grisel
Conn. App. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989).
cited Cited "see" Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 166 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); Black’s Law Dictionary (6th Ed. 1990); J.
cited Cited "see" State v. Bowens
Conn. App. Ct. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Torrice, 20 Conn. App. 75, 92-94 , 564 A.2d 330 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 794 (1989).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." U.S. Bank National Assn. v. Rothermel.
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
The rule that § 49-15 deprives an appellate tribunal of jurisdiction over an appeal in an action for strict foreclosure after the passage of the law day; see, e.g., Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler, 20 Conn. App. 163, 167 , 565 A.2d 252 , cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 792 (1989); is rooted in concerns related to mootness, rather than the existence of a final judgment.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Estrada
Conn. App. Ct. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d. 550 (1986); State v. Cook, 174 Conn. 73, 76 , 381 A.2d 563 (1977); State v. Yochelman, 107 Conn. 148, 152 , 139 A. 632 (1927).” State v. Daniels, 18 Conn. App. 134, 138 , 556 A.2d 1040 (1989); see also State v. Torrice, 20 Conn. App. 75, 90 , 564 A.2d 330 (1989), cert. denied, 213 Conn. 809 , 568 A.2d 794 (1990).
Barclays Bank of New York
v.
William M. Ivler
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 29, 1989.
568 A.2d 792
William M. Ivler, pro se, in support of the petition., Richard E. Castiglioni, in opposition.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 64%
Citer courts: Connecticut Appellate Court (1)

The defendant William M. Ivler’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 163, is denied.