Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. Goulet, 606 A.2d 1327 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. Goulet, 606 A.2d 1327 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Madsen v. Gates (connappct, 2004-10-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Madsen v. Gates
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sampiere v. Zaretsky, 26 Conn. App. 490, 492-93 , 602 A.2d 1037 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 902 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992) (plaintiffs failure to allege in complaint that future medical expenses were anticipated or that she continued to suffer continuing mental pain and anguish precluded recovery for such claims).
cited Cited "see" Dubreuil v. Witt
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Richmond v. Longo, 27 Conn. App. 30, 39 , 604 A.2d 374 , cert, denied, 222 Conn. 902 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barlow v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Section 51-183c does not apply to pretrial or short calendar proceedings." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Board of Education v. East Haven Education Assn., 66 Conn.App. 202 , 216, 784 A.2d 958 (2001) (declining to extend § 51-183c to arbitration process); see also Lafayette Bank & Trust Co. v. Szentkuti, 27 Conn.App. 15 , 19, 603 A.2d 1215 (1992) ("[s]ection 51-183c unambiguously applies exclusively to 'trials,' as distinguished from pretrial or short calendar matters"), cert. denied, 222 Conn. 901 , 606 A.2d 1327 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Filippelli v. Saint Mary's Hospital
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Chouinard v. Marjani, [ 21 Conn. App. 572, 576 , 575 A.2d 238 (1990)]; see also Richmond v. Longo, 27 Conn. App. 30, 39 , 604 A.2d 374 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 902 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992).’’ (Emphasis omitted.) Martins v. Connecti- cut Light & Power Co., 35 Conn. App. 212 , 217–18, 645 A.2d 557 (1994); see also Hayes v. Manchester Memorial Hospital, supra, 38 Conn. App. 474 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Martins v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
“To be excluded the evidence must create prejudice that is undue and so great as to threaten an injustice if the evidence were to be admitted.” (Emphasis in original.) Chouinard v. Marjani, supra, 576 ; see also Richmond v. Longo, 27 Conn. App. 30, 39 , 604 A.2d 374 , cert. denied, 222 Conn. 902 , 606 A.2d 1328 (1992).
Connecticut National Bank
v.
Robert O. Goulet
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 22, 1992.
606 A.2d 1327
Pat Labbadia III, in support of the petition., Thomas E. Crosby, in opposition.
Published

The petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court filed by the defendants Robert O. Goulet and Millicent Goulet is denied.