green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Ayala
See footnote 6 of this opinion. 24 Compare State v. Thompson, 197 Conn. 67 , 72–73, 495 A.2d 1054 (1985) (sales of narcotics between parties five days apart constitute separate trans- actions); State v. Browne, 84 Conn. App. 351 , 373–77, 854 A.2d 13 (engaging officers in pursuit in Middletown and on Route 9 and Interstate 95 two separate acts), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 931 , 859 A.2d 930 (2004); State v. Williams, 59 Conn. App. 603, 607 , 757 A.2d 1191 (carrying pistol without permit on different but uninterrupted days not continuing course of con- duct), cert. denied, 254 Conn. 946 , 762 …
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. VanDeusen
See State v. Channer, 28 Conn. App. 161, 166 , 612 A.2d 95 (noting in review of sufficiency of evidence that reviewing court is limited to considering whether evidence supported finding that defendant acted as principal because trial court did not instruct jury as to accessorial liability), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 921 , 614 A.2d 826 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mendez
See State v. Channer, 28 Conn. App. 161, 169 , 612 A.2d 95 (‘‘evidence clearly demonstrates that the entire chain of events . . . could be [viewed] as intentional conduct supporting’’ conviction of conspir- acy to commit robbery in the first degree [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 921 , 614 A.2d 826 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Channer v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Channer, 28 Conn. App. 161 , 612 A.2d 95 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 921 , 614 A.2d 826 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Martinoli v. Stamford Police Dept.
(2×)
See Mulligan v. F. S. Electric, 231 Conn. 529, 541 , 651 A.2d 254 (1994); Rousu v. Collins Co., Martinoli v. Stamford Police Dept. 114 Conn. 24, 31 , 157 A. 264 (1931); see also Stevens v. Raymark Corp./Raybestos Manhattan, 28 Conn. App. 226, 228 , 610 A.2d 710 (“the relevant date for deter- mining compensation to an injured worker is the date of his incapacity to work . . . where the events leading to a worker’s injury and the incapacity to work do not occur simultaneously” (citation omitted)), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 921 , 614 A.2d 830 (1992).
Fleet Bank of Connecticut
v.
Vincent J. Dowling, Jr. Fleet Bank of Connecticut v. Vincent J. Dowling, Sr.
v.
Vincent J. Dowling, Jr. Fleet Bank of Connecticut v. Vincent J. Dowling, Sr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
Kerry M. Wisser, in support of the petition., Robert A. Izard, Jr., and Denise M. Cloutier, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 28 Conn. App. 221, is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the plaintiff establish probable cause in its application for a prejudgment remedy, in which it alleged that the defendants had agreed to reimburse the plaintiff for the amounts drawn under letters of credit issued by the plaintiff?”