green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc.
See Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 521 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992); see also DiPietro v. Farmington Sports Arena, LLC, 306 Conn. 107 , 116-17, 49 A.3d 951 (2012).
cited
Cited "see"
Mankert v. Elmatco Products, Inc.
See Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 523 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Branhaven Associates v. Vitrom, Inc.
See New Haven v. Konstandinidis, 29 Conn. App. 139 , 612 A.2d 822 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 920 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bisson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
To a considerable degree each case must be decided on its own circumstances." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Hellamns v. Yale-New Haven Hospital, Inc. , supra, 147 Conn. App. at 408 -409 , 82 A.3d 677 ; see Considine v. Waterbury , 279 Conn. 830 , 870, 905 A.2d 70 (2006) ; see also Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos. , 29 Conn. App. 519 , 521, 615 A.2d 1087 (whether defendant had constructive notice of condition causing defect turns on whether condition existed for length of time sufficient for defendant's employees, in exercise of due care, to discover defect in time to have remedied it), cert. d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Considine v. City of Waterbury
Compare McCrorey v. Heilpern, 170 Conn. 220, 222 , 365 A.2d 1057 (1976) (concluding that there was no reasonable basis for jury’s finding of constructive notice because plaintiff proffered no evidence that defective condition existed for any period of time before plaintiffs injury), White v. E & F Construction Co., 151 Conn. 110, 113-14 , 193 A.2d 716 (1963) (evidence that defective condition existed for two minutes before accident was insufficient to charge defendant with constructive notice), and Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 522 , 615 A.2d 1087 (concluding that trier of f…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Colombo v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.
See, e.g., Gulycz v. Stop & Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519, 522 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKeone v. Manchester I-84 Assoc. Ltd., No. Cv 98-0583788-S (May 17, 2000)
"A possessor of land has a duty to an invitee to reasonably inspect and maintain the premises in order to render them reasonably safe." Morin v. Bell Court Condominium Assn., Inc., 223 Conn. 323 , 327 , 612 A.2d 1197 (1992); see also Gulycz v. Stop Shop Cos., 29 Conn. App. 519 , 521 , 615 A.2d 1087 , cert. denied, 224 Conn. 923 , 618 A.2d 527 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
City of New Haven
v.
Angelika Konstandinidis Angelika Papagorgiou v. Angelo Anastopoulos
v.
Angelika Konstandinidis Angelika Papagorgiou v. Angelo Anastopoulos
AC 10784; AC 10380.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 14, 1992.
Angelika Papagorgiou, pro se, in support of the petition., Diane Polan, in opposition.
Published
The petitioners Angelika Konstandinidis’ and Angelika Papagorgiou’s petitions for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 139 (AC 10784) and 29 Conn. App. 142 (AC 10380), are denied.