Tucker v. Woolery, 648 A.2d 192 (Md. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Tucker v. Woolery, 648 A.2d 192 (Md. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Home Builders Ass'n of Greater Des Moines v. City of West Des Moines (iowa, 2002-05-31) · Strongest negative: Wiegmann v. State (mdctspecapp, 1997-12-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
examined Cited "but see" Wiegmann v. State (4×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1997 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Tucker v. Woolery, 99 Md.App. 295, 301 , 637 A.2d 482 (equating "judicial officer” with "officer of the court” and holding that persons appointed by court as Special Masters and Trustees in a divorce action enjoyed qualified judicial immunity), cert. denied, 336 Md. 280 , 648 A.2d 192 (1994). .
discussed Cited "see" Home Builders Ass'n of Greater Des Moines v. City of West Des Moines
Iowa · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wielepski v. Harford County, 98 Md.App. 721 , 635 A.2d 43, 47 (1994) (noting road improvements benefit the public in general, so fee charged to bordering property to pay for improvements cannot be justified on basis that improvements benefit that particular property), vacated on other grounds by Harford County v. Wielepski, 336 Md. 281 , 648 A.2d 192, 193 (1994); cf. Milton O. & Phyllis A. Thorson Revocable Estate Trust *349 v. City of West Des Moines, 531 N.W.2d 647, 650 (Iowa Ct.App.1995) (noting in the context of special assessment that public improvement usually confers special benefit…
cited Cited "see" Kramer v. Mayor of Baltimore
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
Jesse TUCKER
v.
Benjamin J. WOOLERY
No. 29.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Oct 3, 1994.
648 A.2d 192
Charles J. Janus, Temple Hills, for petitioner., Ellen G. Draper (Jordan Coyne & Savits, on brief), Rockville, Benjamin J. Woolery (Richard M. McGill, on brief), Upper Marlboro, for respondent.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari in the above entitled case 'having been granted and heard, it is this 3rd day of October, 1994

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.