Doe v. Marselle, 665 A.2d 606 (Conn. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Doe v. Marselle, 665 A.2d 606 (Conn. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
18 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fink v. Fink, No. Cv95-0546309 (Jan. 17, 1998) (connsuperct, 1998-01-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Fink v. Fink, No. Cv95-0546309 (Jan. 17, 1998)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1998 · confidence medium
Id., 690-91.
cited Cited "see" Nash v. Yap
Conn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bower v. D’Onfro, 38 Conn. App. 685, 696-701 , 663 A.2d 1061 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 911 , 912, 665 A.2d 606 (1995), modified, 45 Conn. App. 543 , 696 A.2d 1285 (1997).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clogher v. United Oil Recovery, Inc., No. 374520 (May 17, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Johnson v. Fuller, 190 Conn. 552 , 558 , 461 A.2d 988 (1983); see also Bower v. Donofrio, 38 Conn. App. 685 , 705-06 , 663 A.2d 1061 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 911 , 665 A.2d 606 (1995) (error for trial court not to accept judicial admission).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JANE DOE
v.
DORIS MARSELLE
SC 15312.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 28, 1995.
665 A.2d 606
Susan L. Garten, in support of the petition., Andrew J. O’Keefe and Maureen Sullivan Dinnan, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 360 (AC 13338), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the second amended complaint did not allege a willful violation of General Statutes § 19a-583 (a)?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly decide that the plaintiffs negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act counts had been properly stricken?”