green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Jones, 39 Conn. App. 563 , 564–65, 568, 665 A.2d 910 (self-defense jury instruction was provided in case in which defendant was hiding behind tree and took out his gun to shoot at rival gang member who was looking for him but inadvertently shot five year old girl in face as she passed by in car driven by her grandmother), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 800 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Mazurek v. Town of East Haven
See State v. McNally, 39 Conn. App. 419, 424 , 665 A.2d 137 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 1269 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mendoza
State v. Fullwood, 194 Conn. 573, 584 , 484 A.2d 435 (1984); see State v. Hawthorne, 176 Conn. 367, 373-74 , 407 A.2d 1001 (1978).” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Lanier, 39 Conn. App. 478, 482 , 664 A. 2d 1202 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 1269 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Sabre
See State v. Lanier, 39 Conn. App. 478, 484 , 664 A.2d 1202 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 1269 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Holley
See, e.g., State v. McNally , 39 Conn. App. 419 , 424, 665 A.2d 137 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 1269 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ruocco
Compare State v. McNally, 39 Conn. App. 419, 424 , 665 A.2d 137 (‘‘expert opinion . . . properly excluded on the ground that a determina- tion of a person’s intoxication based solely on observa- tion and not on an interpretation of sobriety tests is within the general knowledge of the jury’’ [emphasis in original]), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 1269 (1995), with State v. Lamme, 19 Conn. App. 594 , 603– 604, 563 A.2d 1372 (1989) (expert testimony that defen- dant intoxicated admissible because based on interpretation of sobriety test), aff’d, 216 Conn. 172 , 579 A.2d 484…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Singleton
(2×)
See State v. Hall, 213 Conn. 579, 584 , 569 A.2d 534 (1990) (rejecting claim that self-defense and reckless *694 manslaughter are "mutually incompatible" and holding that self-defense is valid defense to unintentional crime of second degree manslaughter); see also State v. Jones, 39 Conn.App. 563 , 567 n. 4, 665 A.2d 910 ("[s]elf-defense is a valid defense to crimes based on reckless conduct as well as intentional conduct"), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 800 (1995); State v. King, 24 Conn.App. 586, 590-91 , 590 A.2d 490 (stating that self-defense is valid defense to "the unintentional…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mroczek v. Kret
Our Supreme Court has held that “in cases involving questions of science and skill, or relating to some art or trade, experts are permitted to give opinions,” however, that principle does not embrace those questions “the knowledge of which is presumed to be common to all men.” Taylor v. Monroe, 43 Conn. 36, 43 (1875); see also State v. McNally, 39 Conn. App. 419, 424 , 665 A.2d 137 (stating that expert opinion unnecessary when jury capable of determining issue on basis of its own knowledge, experience), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 931 , 667 A.2d 1269 (1995); 2 Jones on Evidence (6th Ed. 19…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JAMES F. BRANDT
v.
PATTI C. BRANDT
v.
PATTI C. BRANDT
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 28, 1995.
C. Ian McLachlan, in support of the petition., Cantin and Associates, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 15005) is denied.