green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bermudez
See State v. Lasky, 43 Conn. App. 619, 625-26 , 685 A.2d 336 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 959 , 688 A.2d 328 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Velasco
See State v. Lasky, 43 Conn. App. 619, 635-36 , 685 A.2d 336 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 959 , 688 A.2d 328 (1997) (trial court properly instructed jurors that “evidence consisted only of the testimony of witnesses and the exhibits, and that questions [by counsel] were not evidence”); Duve v. Duve 25 Conn. App. 262, 269 , 594 A.2d 473 , cert. denied, 220 Conn. 911 , 597 A.2d 332 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1114 , 112 S. Ct. 1224 , 117 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bonsu
See State v. Lasky, 43 Conn. App. 619, 635-36 , 685 A.2d 336 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 959 , 688 A.2d 328 (1997); see also In re Michelle G., 52 Conn. App. 187, 190 , 727 A.2d 226 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Rodriguez
See State v. Silva, 43 Conn. App. 488 , 684 A.2d 725 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 956 , 688 A.2d 329 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Radzvilowicz
In making such a showing, it is essential that the defendant present enough information—regarding the nature of the testimony he wishes to give on one count and his reasons for not wishing to testify on the other—to satisfy the court that the claim of prejudice is genuine and to enable it intelligently to weigh the considerations of ‘economy and expedition in judicial administration’ against the defendant’s interest in having a free choice with respect to testifying.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Cox, 934 F.2d 1114, 1120 (10th Cir. 1991), quoting United Stat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Amanda A.
The appellate tribunal is free, therefore, to respond to the defendant’s claim by focusing on whichever condition is most relevant in the particular circumstances.” (Emphasis in original.) State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. 239 -40; see also State v. Lasky, 43 Conn. App. 619 , 631 n.5, 685 A.2d 336 (1996), cert. denied, 239 Conn. 959 , 688 A.2d 328 (1997). “[AJmendment twenty-one’s protection for those possessing physical and mental disabilities identifies the members of this class as a group especially subject to discrimination and requires the application of the highest standard of r…
TOWN OF HAMDEN
v.
CHARLES FLANAGAN
v.
CHARLES FLANAGAN
SC 15591.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 8, 1997.
Gordon R. Raynor, in support of the petition., John J. Graubard, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
The petition by the defendants Warren Edward Blake and Phyllis M. Blake, executrix, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 904 (AC 15104), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the trial court abuse its discretion and equitable powers by approving the committee sale in this foreclosure action of thirty-nine acres of property for the sum of $50,000, the value of which was appraised at $280,000?”
[*960] Decided January 8, 1997 Gordon R. Raynor, in support of the petition. John J. Graubard, in opposition.