State v. Luster, 717 A.2d 239 (Conn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Luster, 717 A.2d 239 (Conn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnson v. Paramour, No. Cv00 037 18 20 (May 2, 2002) (connsuperct, 2002-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Johnson v. Paramour, No. Cv00 037 18 20 (May 2, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · confidence medium
"Three factors have usually been identified as of primary importance in considering whether a former criminal conviction is to be admitted: (1) the extent of the prejudice likely to arise; (2) the significance of the commission of the particular crime in indicating untruthfulness; and (3) its remoteness in time." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Luster, 48 Conn. App. 872 , 875-76 , 713 A.2d 277 , cert. denied, 246 Conn. 901 , 717 A.2d 239 4 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Rodriguez v. E.D. Construction, Inc. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Herbert v. RWA, Inc., 48 Conn. App. 449, 458 , 709 A.2d 1149 , cert. denied, 246 Conn. 901 , 717 A.2d 239 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pauling (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Luster, 48 Conn. App. 872, 880-81 , 713 A.2d 277 , cert. denied, 246 Conn. 901 , 717 A.2d 239 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Barker v. All Roofs by Dominic (2×)
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Mancini v. Bureau of Public Works, supra, 167 Conn. 193 , 196–97 (finding no error in trial court’s directions to jury on part or process element without making reference to whether defendant sup- plied tools or materials or directly oversaw work); Fox v. Fafnir Bearing Co., supra, 107 Conn. 194–96 (uphold- ing commissioner’s conclusion that defendant was prin- cipal employer without making reference to whether defendant supplied tools or materials or directly over- saw work); see also Hebert v. RWA, Inc., 48 Conn. App. 449 , 454–55, 709 A.2d 1149 (upholding commissioner’s find…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ARTHUR LUSTER
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 23, 1998.
717 A.2d 239
Deborah Krauss Snyder, special public defender, in support of the petition., Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Berdon.
Published

Lead Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 872 (AC 17120), is denied.

Dissent

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.

KATZ and NORCOTT, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.