green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jackson
Although we recognize that the requested continuance likely would have cured any then existing prejudice to the defendant as a result of the late disclosure; see State v. Van Eck , 69 Conn. App. 482 , 498-99, 795 A.2d 582 (court did not abuse discretion in electing to continue matter for almost one month for defendant to obtain records, which were not previously disclosed to him), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 937 , 802 A.2d 92 , and cert. denied, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1057 (2002) ; we are mindful that granting the six week continuance requested would have caused a substantial disruption to the t…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wilson F.
See State v. Van Eck, 69 Conn. App. 482, 489-90 , 795 A.2d 582 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 937 , 802 A.2d 92 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1057 (2002); State v. Ryan, 53 Conn. App. 606, 620 , 733 A.2d 273 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moore
See, e.g., State v. Van Eck, 69 Conn. App. 482 , 503 n.23, 795 A.2d 582 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 937 , 802 A.2d 92 , 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1057 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
HERMAN VAN ECK
v.
HERMAN VAN ECK
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 26, 2002.
Herman Van Eck, pro se, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Da,uster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 482 (AC 20595), is denied.