Barile v. Comm'r of Corr., 847 A.2d 310 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Barile v. Comm'r of Corr., 847 A.2d 310 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Fleury (connappct, 2012-05-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Fleury (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Practice Book § 41-18. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Thompson, 81 Conn.App. 264, 284 , 839 A.2d 622 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 915 , 847 A.2d 312 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Parker (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barile v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 787, 789-90 , 837 A.2d 827 (concluding that petitioner had procedurally defaulted on habeas claim of ineffective assistance of counsel due to counsel's failure to obtain copies of victims’ statements, which rendered petitioner’s guilty plea not knowingly and voluntarily made, because petitioner had not raised his claim at sentencing, on direct appeal or pursuant to motion to correct illegal sentence under § 43-22), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 915 , 847 A.2d 310 (2004). 21 Nonetheless, this court consistently has adhered to a rule that, a…
discussed Cited "see" Zabian v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Barile v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 787, 790 , 837 A.2d 827 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 915 , 847 A.2d 310 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Carpenter v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carpenter v. Commissioner of Correction, 268 Conn. 917 , 847 A.2d 310 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Balbuena v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Thompson, 81 Conn. App. 264, 287 , 839 A.2d 622 (‘‘[a]lthough the stipulation may have been disadvantageous to the defendant, it was an element that necessarily had to be proven under § 53a-217’’), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 915 , 847 A.2d 312 (2004).
KEITH BARILE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 24, 2004.
847 A.2d 310
Arnold V. Amore II, special public defender, in support of the petition., Toni M. Smith-Rosario, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The petitioner Keith Barile’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 787 (AC 23511), is denied.