State v. Orellana, 876 A.2d 1202 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Orellana, 876 A.2d 1202 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
121 citation events (121 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Salters v. Commissioner of Correction (connappct, 2017-08-29)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" Salters v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Orellana , 89 Conn.App. 71 , 106, 872 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005) ; see also State v. Maguire , 310 Conn. 535 , 552, 78 A.3d 828 (2013) ("[w]hen a defendant raises on appeal a claim that improper remarks by the prosecutor deprived [him] of his constitutional right to a fair trial, the burden is on the defendant to show ... that the remarks were improper" [internal quotation marks omitted] ).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bennett (2×)
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See id., at 776, 97 A.3d 478 , citing State v. Orellana , 89 Conn.App. 71 , 101, 872 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Schuler (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Orellana, 89 Conn. App. 71, 89 , 872 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Albino (2×)
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Stevenson, 269 Conn. 563, 585 , 849 A.2d 626 (2004) (prosecutor properly argued that state’s witnesses did not have motive to lie, whereas defendant and his wit- nesses did have such motive). 2 Impugning Defense Counsel We next turn to the defendant’s claim that the prose- cutor improperly characterized defense counsel’s strat- egy in a manner to suggest that he employed tactics intended to mislead the jury.4 See State v. Orellana, 89 Conn. App. 71, 101 , 872 A.2d 506 (distinguishing between improper argument disparaging integrity or role of defense counsel and proper argume…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Crespo (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Orellana, 89 Conn. App. 71, 82 , 872 A.2d 506 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Orellana v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Orellana, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Luster (2×)
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Orellana, 89 Conn. App. 71, 103 , 872 A.2d 506 , *435 cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005) (prosecutor improperly implied defense counsel’s argument was deceptive and without basis in fact or reason).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Nathan S. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Dawes, 122 Conn. App. 303, 314 , 999 A.2d 794 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 912 , 4 A.3d 834 (2010); see also State v. Orellana, [ 89 Conn. App. 71, 105 , 872 A.2d 506 ] (isolated misstatement not prosecutorial impropriety) [cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005)]. . . . [W]e do not scrutinize each individual comment in a vacuum, but rather we must review the comments complained of in the context of the entire trial.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Henry B.-A., supra, 234 Conn. App. 221 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Henry B.-A. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
State v. Dawes, 122 Conn. App. 303, 314 , 999 A.2d 794 , cert. denied, 298 Conn. 912 , 4 A.3d 834 (2010); see also State v. Orellana, [ 89 Conn. App. 71, 105 , 872 A.2d 506 ] (isolated misstatement not prosecutorial impropriety) [cert. denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005)]. . . . [W]e do not scrutinize each individual comment in a vacuum, but rather we must review the comments complained of in the context of the entire trial.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Chankar, 173 Conn. App. 227, 255 , 162 A.3d 756 , cert. denied, 326 Conn. 914 , 173 A.3d 390 (2017). ‘‘This…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Groups, LLC v. Nardi
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see also · confidence low
Th[e] action is concerned solely with material misrepresentation in the inducement of the contract.”); see also Martinez v. Zovich, 87 Conn. App. 766, 778 , 867 A.2d 149 , cert. denied, 274 Conn. 908 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005); cf. Gibson v. Capano, supra, 241 Conn. 733 (Warman inapplicable to innocent misrepresentation claims).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Webster (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Orellana, 89 Conn. App. 71, 84-89 , 872 A.2d 506 (concluding that evidence of prior drug sales by defendant relevant to proving elements of crime), cert, denied, 274 Conn. 910 , 876 A.2d 1202 (2005).
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Eddy ORELLANA.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 22, 2005.
876 A.2d 1202
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Toni M. Smith-Rosario, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn.App. 71, 872 A.2d 506 (2005), is denied.