green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Phillips
(2×)
See State v. Falcon, 90 Conn. App. 111, 121 , 876 A.2d 547 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. John O.
See State v. Antonio A., 90 Conn. App. 286, 294 , 878 A.2d 358 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1189 , 126 S. Ct. 1373 , 164 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Hamlin v. Commissioner of Correction
See Burke v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 370, 374-75 , 877 A.2d 885 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1241 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Driscoll
See Pion v. Bean, 2003 VT 79, ¶ 30 , 176 Vt. 1 , 883 A.2d 1248 ; Gazo v. Gazo, 166 Vt. 434, 446 , 697 A.2d 342, 349 (1997); Klein v. Klein, 150 Vt. 466, 469 , 555 A.2d 382, 385 (1988). ¶ 13.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Holbrook
See State v. Antonio A., 90 Conn. App. 286, 296-97 , 878 A.2d 358 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1189 , 126 S. Ct. 1373 , 164 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Schiavo
See State v. Antonio A., 90 Conn. App. 286, 301 , 878 A.2d 358 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1246 (2005); State v. Goodson, 84 Conn. App. 786, 799 , 856 A.2d 1012 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 515 (2004); see also State v. Paradise, 213 Conn. 388, 400 , 567 A.2d 1221 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez v. Commissioner of Correction
Compare Burke v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 90 Conn. App. 370, 379 , 877 A.2d 885 (without testimony from petitioner’s codefendant that he would have invoked fifth amendment privilege if asked to tes- tify at trial, ‘‘[this court] cannot speculate that [he] would have invoked his privilege, and the petitioner has done nothing more than provide us with conjec- ture’’), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1241 (2005), and State v. Cecarelli, 32 Conn. App. 811 , 818–19, 631 A.2d 862 (1993) (trial court was not entitled to rely on representation by witness’ attorney that witnes…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Purvis
See State v. Jimenez, 73 Conn. App. 664 , 667–68, 808 A.2d 1190 (affirming conviction pursuant to § 21a- 278 (b) (1) (A) when only evidence presented was plas- tic bag of cocaine found in backseat of police cruiser after defendant’s transport to police station), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 929 , 814 A.2d 381 (2002); see also State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676 , 682–83, 879 A.2d 457 (concluding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction of possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of school when no sale was alleged to have been made), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Anthony L.
Penetration may be committed by an object manipulated by the actor into the genital or anal opening of the victim's body." General Statutes § 53a-65(2). "[D]igital penetration, however slight, of the genital opening, is sufficient to constitute vaginal intercourse." (Emphasis omitted.) State v. Albert , 252 Conn. 795 , 806-807, 750 A.2d 1037 (2000) ; see also State v. Antonio A. , 90 Conn. App. 286 , 295, 878 A.2d 358 (digital penetration constitutes sexual intercourse by object manipulated by actor), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 926 , 883 A.2d 1246 (2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1189 , 126 S.Ct. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Martinez
See, e.g., State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676, 682-83 , 879 A.2d 457 (expert testimony that “drug dealers often will stash their drugs in a hidden location so that if they are stopped by the police, they can claim that they are not in possession of drugs”), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005); State v. Waden, 84 Conn. App. 147, 153-54 , 852 A.2d 817 (“the state presented expert testimony that it is common for a street level drug dealer to keep a ‘stash’ of narcotics in an area close to where he is selling, rather than have a significant quantity on his person”), cer…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Myers
See, e.g., State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676, 688-89 , 879 A.2d 457 (approving similar instruction as balanced and fair), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hedge
Although the large quantity of drugs that the police found in the defendant’s vehicle supports an inference that the defendant had intended to sell the drugs somewhere; see, e.g., State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676, 682 , 879 A.2d 457 (quantity of narcotics and manner of packaging indicative of intent to sell), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005); it was insufficient to support a finding that he had intended to sell them within 1500 feet of Marina Village.
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Juan FALCON.
v.
Juan FALCON.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2005.
Published
Stephanie L. Evans, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn.App. 111, 876 A.2d 547 (2005), is denied.