State v. Keith B., 901 A.2d 1227 (Conn. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Keith B., 901 A.2d 1227 (Conn. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Pond (connappct, 2012-09-25)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Pond
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: accord · confidence high
Therefore, the court concluded in Gonzalez, the language, “in the commission of such offense [the perpetrator] uses, or is armed with and threatens the use of or displays or represents by his words or conduct that he possesses” a firearm, “[l]ack[s] a specifically enumerated mental state . . . clearly indicating] . . . that the firearm element is one of general intent, requiring only that the perpetrator act volitionally in some way to use, possess or threaten to use a firearm in the commission of the offense.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gonzalez, supra, 300 Conn. 501…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. White
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see also · confidence low
The use of a dangerous instrument simply represents the means by which the defendant is alleged to have participated in causing the serious physical injury, but to be culpable, the defendant only needs to have the intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, not the intent to do so with a danger- ous instrument.’’ (Citation omitted; emphasis in origi- nal; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Artis, supra, 136 Conn. App. 584–85; see also State v. Miller, 95 Conn. App. 362 , 371–77, 896 A.2d 844 (holding that crime of first degree manslaughter with firearm did not r…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Patel (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Although the Court [in Crawford ] did not adopt any one of these formulations, its statement that '[t]hese formulations all share a common nucleus and then define the Clause's coverage at various levels of abstraction around it' suggests that the Court would use the reasonable expectation of the declarant as the anchor of a more concrete definition of testimony." (Citations omitted; emphasis added; footnote omitted.) Id., at 228-29 ; see also State v. Miller , 95 Conn. App. 362 , 382, 896 A.2d 844 (discussing Saget ), cert. denied, 279 Conn. 907 , 901 A.2d 1228 (2006).
State of Connecticut
v.
Keith B.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 29, 2006.
901 A.2d 1227
Jodi Zils Gagne, in support of the petition., Lisa A. Riggione, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Vertefeuille.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 95 Conn. App. 643 (AC 26223), is denied.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.