State v. Beavers, 918 A.2d 276 (Conn. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Beavers, 918 A.2d 276 (Conn. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Mark (connappct, 2017-01-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mark (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rosario , 99 Conn.App. 92 , 106, 912 A.2d 1064 ("[a]lthough the defendant frames the [third party culpability] issue on appeal as a constitutional violation, our ultimate determination rests on evidentiary grounds"), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 925 , 918 A.2d 276 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Sells (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Beavers, 99 Conn. App. 183 , 193 n.5, 912 A.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 281 Conn. 925 , 918 A.2d 276 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thornton (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Beavers, 99 Conn. App. 183 , 193 n.5, 912 A.2d 1105 , cert. denied, 281 Conn. 925 , 918 A.2d 276 (2007). 11 Defense counsel argued in part: “I’ve never defended a same sex case; I’ve defended and prosecuted a number of male-female cases.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sclafani Properties, LLC v. Sport-N-Life Distributing, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
A court utiliz- ing the factors of rule 1.5 (a) considers, [among other things], the time and labor spent by the attorneys, the novelty and complexity of the legal issues, fees custom- arily charged in the same locality for similar services, the lawyer’s experience and ability, relevant time limita- tions, the magnitude of the case and the results obtained, the nature and length of the lawyer-client relationship, and whether the fee is fixed or contingent.’’ (Citations omitted; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc., supra, 265 Conn. 25…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jarmon (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Edwards, 100 Conn. App. 565 , 575–76, 918 A.2d 1008 (testimony of witnesses describing gun used in robberies, which matched gun found in defendant’s flight path and ballis- tics testing of which showed it was same gun fired in separate shooting deemed sufficient for operability inference), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 928 , 929, 926 A.2d 666 , 667 (2007); State v. Miles, 97 Conn. App. 236, 241 , 903 A.2d 675 (2006) (operability proven where victim saw defendant with small silver handgun that matched gun introduced into evidence, defendant was only per- son victim saw with gun, and …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jarmon (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Edwards, 100 Conn. App. 565 , 575–76, 918 A.2d 1008 (testimony of witnesses describing gun used in robberies, which matched gun found in defendant’s flight path and ballis- tics testing of which showed it was same gun fired in separate shooting deemed sufficient for operability inference), cert. denied, 282 Conn. 928 , 929, 926 A.2d 666 , 667 (2007); State v. Miles, 97 Conn. App. 236, 241 , 903 A.2d 675 (2006) (operability proven where victim saw defendant with small silver handgun that matched gun introduced into evidence, defendant was only per- son victim saw with gun, and …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Berrios (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Rosario , 99 Conn. App. 92 , 105, 912 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 281 Conn. 925 , 918 A.2d 276 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Franklin (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
Reversal is required only [when] an abuse of discretion is manifest or [when] injustice appears to have been done." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres , supra, 168 Conn.App. at 623 -24 , 148 A.3d 238 ; see also State v. Rosario , 99 Conn.App. 92 , 104, 912 A.2d 1064 , cert. denied, 281 Conn. 925 , 918 A.2d 276 (2007). *42 The defendant argues that the uncharged misconduct evidence, specifically, that Lofton's testimony that he observed the defendant discharge a firearm, 20 aroused the emotions, hostility or sympathy of the members of the jury. 21 He further maintains that this…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Buddy C. BEAVERS, Jr.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 6, 2007.
918 A.2d 276
Published

Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Julia K. Conlin, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 99 Conn.App. 183, 912 A.2d 1105 (2007), is denied.