green
Positive treatment
19.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Greenwood Gaming and Entertainment, Inc. v. Com.
Thus, the statute is plainly constitutional at least with regard to those categories of claims for which the statute provides a reasonable opportunity to obtain a refund. 927 A.2d at 204 (Saylor, J., concurring).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mission Funding Alpha v. Commonwealth, Aplt.
(2×)
DaimlerChrysler, 927 A.2d at 201.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board ex rel. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.
The City avers denying such relief is consistent with DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 885 A.2d 117, 120-21 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005) (concluding state refund provision is statute of repose and thus rejecting refund request despite event giving rise to request occurring after time limitation lapsed), as well as then-justice Saylor’s concurring statement in our per curiam affirmance of that case, DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 592 Pa. 612 , 927 A.2d 201, 203 (2007) (Saylor, J., concurring) (“[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning a…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Phila. v. Tax Review Bd., Aplts.
The City avers denying such relief is consistent with DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 885 A.2d 117, 120-21 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (concluding state refund provision is statute of repose and thus rejecting refund request despite event giving rise to request occurring after time limitation lapsed), as well as then-Justice Saylor’s concurring statement in our per curiam affirmance of that case, DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 927 A.2d 201, 203 (Pa. 2007) (Saylor, J., concurring) (“[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning all simil…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Phila., Aplt. v. Tax Review Bd.
The City avers denying such relief is consistent with DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 885 A.2d 117, 120-21 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (concluding state refund provision is statute of repose and thus rejecting refund request despite event giving rise to request occurring after time limitation lapsed), as well as then-Justice Saylor’s concurring statement in our per curiam affirmance of that case, DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 927 A.2d 201, 203 (Pa. 2007) (Saylor, J., concurring) (“[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning all simil…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Phila., Aplt. v. Tax Review Bd.
The City avers denying such relief is consistent with DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 885 A.2d 117, 120-21 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (concluding state refund provision is statute of repose and thus rejecting refund request despite event giving rise to request occurring after time limitation lapsed), as well as then-Justice Saylor’s concurring statement in our per curiam affirmance of that case, DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 927 A.2d 201, 203 (Pa. 2007) (Saylor, J., concurring) (“[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning all simil…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Phila. v. Tax Review Bd., Aplts.
The City avers denying such relief is consistent with DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 885 A.2d 117, 120-21 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (concluding state refund provision is statute of repose and thus rejecting refund request despite event giving rise to request occurring after time limitation lapsed), as well as then-Justice Saylor’s concurring statement in our per curiam affirmance of that case, DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 927 A.2d 201, 203 (Pa. 2007) (Saylor, J., concurring) (“[W]here a statutory limitation provision is not merely ‘one of general application spanning all simil…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Quest Diagnostics Venture, LLC v. Commonwealth
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealth, 592 Pa. 612 , 927 A.2d 201, 203-04 (2007) (Saylor, J., concurring). 5 The petitioner has the burden of establishing the timeliness of the petition for refund.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. Baney v. M. Fisher
See, e.g., Prevish v. Northwest Medical Center—Oil City Campus, 692 A.2d 192, 197-98 (Pa. Super. 1997), aff’d, 717 A.2d 1023 (Pa. 1998) (holding that a plaintiff waived the claim that the discovery rule tolled the applicable statute of limitations where the plaintiff did not plead sufficient facts in the complaint or in the responsive pleading to the defendant’s preliminary objections that implicitly raised the statute of limitations issue, but first raised the claim in a statement of errors complained of on appeal). 13 DaimlerChrysler Corporation v. Commonwealth, 885 A.2d 117 , 119 n.5 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William R. GOWDEN, Appellee
v.
STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BOARD, Appellant
v.
STATE EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT BOARD, Appellant
89 MAP 2006.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Jun 25, 2007.
Former, Newman.
Published
ORDER
PER CURIAM.The order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.
Former Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.