green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2007 ·
…ubrogation is not a cause of action in and of itself. rather, the doctrine of subrogation allows a party to step into the shoes of another in order to pursue a cause of action.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLC
(2×)
ubrogation is not a cause of action in and of itself. rather, the doctrine of subrogation allows a party to step into the shoes of another in order to pursue a cause of action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lisy Corp. v. McCormick & Co.
(2×)
See Duckett v. Riley, 401 Md. 172 , 931 A.2d 1095 (2007) (granting certiorari on September 12, 2007). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Handy v. State
Further, “[i]t is well-settled that when specific grounds are given at trial for an objection, the party objecting will be held to those grounds and ordinarily waives any grounds not specified that are later raised on appeal.” Klauenberg v. State, 355 Md. 528, 541 , 735 A.2d 1061 (1999); accord Ayala v. State, 174 Md.App. 647, 665 , 923 A.2d 952 , cert. denied, 401 Md. 173 , 931 A.2d 1095 (2007); see also Thomas v. State, 183 Md.App. 152, 177 , 960 A.2d 666 (2008) (“Where a party asserts specific grounds for an objection, all other grounds not speci *538 fied by the party are waived.”)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kent SAND
v.
Jacksonville MACH.
v.
Jacksonville MACH.
Pet. Docket No. 207.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Sep 12, 2007.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (2)
Petition for writ of certiorari granted.