State v. Corley, 950 A.2d 1285 (Conn. 2008). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Corley, 950 A.2d 1285 (Conn. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Artiaco (connappct, 2018-04-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2008 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2008 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Artiaco
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Betancourt , 106 Conn. App. 627 , 641, 942 A.2d 557 (asking jury to believe *795 witness unless there is evidence to discredit that witness is proper and in no way shifts burden of proof), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 910 , 950 A.2d 1285 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Toles v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dawson v. Commissioner of Correction, 106 Conn. App. 614 , 624 n. 10, 942 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 909 , 950 A.2d 1285 (2008).
discussed Cited "see" Williams v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dawson v. Commissioner of Correction, 106 Conn. App. 614, 626 , 942 A.2d 519 (“[b]ecause the court’s memorandum of decision is devoid of any findings or analysis on the issue, and because the petitioner did not seek an articulation, the record is inadequate, and we cannot review his claim”), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 909 , 950 A.2d 1285 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tatum v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Corley, 106 Conn. App. 682, 690 , 943 A.2d 501 (‘‘although the pro- posed evidence may have shown that [the third-party suspect] bore a physical resemblance to the defendant, there was no evidence that [the third-party suspect] and the other male were involved in the’’ crime committed), cert. denied, 287 Conn. 909 , 950 A.2d 1285 (2008).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Saunders v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
In its analysis, a reviewing court may look to the performance prong or to the prejudice prong, and the petitioner’s failure to prove either is fatal to a habeas petition.” (Citation omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Faraday v. Commissioner of Correction, 107 Conn. App. 769, 773 , 946 A.2d 891 (2008); see also Dawson v. Commissioner of Correction, 106 Conn. App. 614, 623-24 , 942 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 287 Conn. 909 , 950 A.2d 1285 (2008).
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Keenan CORLEY.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 13, 2008.
950 A.2d 1285
Published

Raymond L. Durelli, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Frederick W. Fawcett, supervisory assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 106 Conn.App. 682, 943 A.2d 501 (2008), is denied.